Our national obsession with standardized-test scores is dangerous. The idea that there is only One Right Answer, the answer to the test question, plants the seeds of authoritarian rule. Standardized tests encourage a standardized way of thinking. If there is only one right answer, there is no need to think, to question, to discuss. We breed compliance and complacency. We see challenges to authority as disloyal. The foundations of democracy break down.
I was shocked into this realization when my grandson phoned with a homework question. 鈥淲hat did you learn in school that helps you be a good citizen?鈥 he asked. His question stopped me. A good citizen? In my day, teachers graded us for citizenship. A high grade meant the student was quiet. I was always talking. I earned high grades for academics, but for citizenship鈥攗nsatisfactory. It didn鈥檛 matter. It didn鈥檛 count in our grade point average, and GPA was what mattered. Citizenship was an empty word.
I grew up in the 鈥50s, the era of the white picket fence and the gray flannel suit. We lived in fear鈥攐f Communism, of a Soviet invasion, of nuclear bombs. We stored canned goods in the basements of our homes and sat on the floor of the school basement with our heads between our legs for air-raid drills. Education was lock-step. In science class, we memorized a list of birds common to North America. The test required us to simply write the list. We never even saw pictures of these birds to match with the names. In English, we memorized rules of grammar. In history, we memorized dates, names of battles, names of colonies, names of presidents. There was only one right answer, and that was the answer that would get us an A on the test. I needed A鈥檚. As a first-generation American, I needed to get to college. I needed to succeed. Being a good American citizen meant getting a job and getting rich.
Creating good American citizens rests on the character of our teachers鈥攏ot the facts they teach, but who they are and <i>how</i> they teach.
But America paid the price for One Right Answer. In the 鈥50s, authorities often viewed with distrust those who questioned. In order to be heard, questioners shouted; confrontations became violent. The decade that followed was a decade of open rebellion. The civil rights movement, the feminist movement, the anti-war movement鈥攁ll sprang from folks saying, 鈥淒on鈥檛 tell me what to do. I can think for myself.鈥
Education had to change, and it did. I was excited to see my children attend schools that encouraged them to think, to question, to listen and discuss various points of view, to learn how to learn. But our current overemphasis on standardized tests, penalizing teachers whose students don鈥檛 perform well, pressuring students to learn the right answer鈥攖hese are major steps backward.
I value good American citizens. I don鈥檛 like orange alerts; they remind me of my childhood air-raid drills. I want to feel safe. I want to trust my neighbors. I want my children and grandchildren to feel secure and trusting. But back to my grandson鈥檚 question: What did I learn in school that helped me become a good citizen? How did I learn the values underlying my loyalty and commitment to America?
First, I learned to think and ask questions, not from the lock-step teachers, but from the exceptions. Daily, on my way out the door to school, my mother reminded me, 鈥淚f there鈥檚 anything you don鈥檛 understand, ask the teacher.鈥 My 2nd grade teacher, Miss Siegel, taught us how to think. She asked questions and pushed our class to think outside the facts. 鈥淲hat will happen if 鈥︹ and 鈥淗ow would you like this story to end?鈥 were heard regularly. Miss Pelaez, my junior high school English teacher, passed out blank paper and urged us to 鈥渨rite what comes to mind.鈥 She was undaunted by the McCarthy era. She did not worry about our thinking or writing something un-American. She validated free thinking.
I remember the day Mrs. Josephs, my high school English teacher, was called out of class to the principal鈥檚 office. She had assigned For Whom the Bell Tolls; the principal told her to cancel the assignment because the text was sexually explicit. Instead, she posted a list of pages (with the sexiest scenes) and told us not to read them. That day I learned how to use creativity and humor under fire. I saw how she thought and worked with, not against, people holding different views.
I recall Mr. Morse, a college professor who had a strong belief in his students鈥 ability to think. His classroom was silent; he listened intently to each student, and by his behavior taught us to listen to each other. That skill is invaluable to me in raising my family, building close relationships, and certainly in becoming an informed citizen.
If there is only one right answer, there is nothing to be curious about.
Second, I learned to develop a healthy emotional attitude. I appreciate Miss Allen, my junior high school vice principal, who welcomed me into her office and allowed me to vent. I was no good at conforming. I was hard on myself and angry toward others. I felt left out of cliques. I hated losing competitions. She took time to listen. She knew if I remained hurt, I would lash out and hurt others. Instead, she handed me Kleenex, often suggested a different perspective, and sent me back to class kinder to myself and to others. Teaching students to regurgitate answers overlooks the emotional needs of children. A good citizen must respond to those who are hurting. Otherwise, we risk their rage and are horrified at the current epidemic of youth violence.
Third, from all these teachers I learned to value an open mind. But permission to be curious, I learned first from Miss Aiken, my kindergarten teacher. With no pressures of accountability and progress, she allowed me to sit for hours on the window seat studying rainbows in cut crystals. I鈥檓 still as curious鈥攁bout new ideas, new people. If there is only one right answer, there is nothing to be curious about.
How did I learn to be a good citizen? Not by staying silent in class. Not by memorizing facts. Creating good American citizens rests on the character of our teachers鈥攏ot the facts they teach, but who they are and how they teach. In our time of 鈥渘o child left behind,鈥 which places tremendous emphasis on standardization, I fear that the essential lessons for becoming a good American are precisely what are being left behind. I鈥檝e yet to see a tombstone marking a grade point average or an SAT score.