澳门跑狗论坛

As the first lady of Arkansas back in the 1980s, Hillary Rodham Clinton spearheaded an effort to bring rigorous public school courses to all corners of that state. As a U.S. senator from New York, she pushed for prekindergarten expansion nationally, before the issue caught political fire. And, as a presidential candidate in 2008, she clashed with her chief rival, then-Sen. Barack Obama, on tying teacher pay partly to students鈥� test scores.

Ms. Clinton hasn鈥檛 yet declared her candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, much less provided a point-by-point plan on how she might look to shape education policy as president. But almost a year before the first primary, she is widely seen as the presumptive favorite for her party鈥檚 nomination should she choose to run, even as potential alternatives such as Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, and former Maryland Gov. Martin O鈥橫alley stand in the wings.

That dominance contrasts with a wide-open prospective Republican field that includes at least one prominent likely contender, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who is closely identified with education issues.

Although Ms. Clinton鈥檚 most recent public office, U.S. secretary of state, kept her away from the domestic-policy fray, her outsize stature in the political landscape makes her record on education as on other issues, such as health, the inevitable focus of early attention鈥攁nd speculation.

Ms. Clinton鈥檚 history of involvement in children鈥檚 issues鈥攇oing back to her work in the 1970s for an anti-poverty organization that later became the Children鈥檚 Defense Fund鈥攐ffers clues to where she might want to go on academic standards, teacher quality, and early learning, among other matters, and the approach she鈥檇 take to get there.

鈥淪he doesn鈥檛 care about education just because everyone is supposed to care about education,鈥� said Mildred Otero, a former aide to Ms. Clinton when she was a senator and a presidential candidate. 鈥淐hildren鈥檚 issues have really just been her issues for a really long time, before she ever entered public life.鈥�

When it comes to crafting policy, Ms. Clinton wants to know what the latest research is, and what people who have a stake in a particular issue think, Ms. Otero added.

鈥淪he has been around long enough and trying to do major change long enough to understand that you鈥檙e never going to impose policy on people. You need them to get there with you.鈥�

But Chester E. Finn Jr., who served in the U.S. Department of Education under President Ronald Reagan and has been closely watching federal policy for decades, said he doesn鈥檛 think of Ms. Clinton as a 鈥渟ignificant figure鈥� on education issues. From what he鈥檚 seen, he said in an email, she has oscillated 鈥渂etween gutsy change agent and defender of the conventional wisdom.鈥�

鈥淚鈥檝e no idea which version would prevail were she president, and I鈥檒l bet she doesn鈥檛 either,鈥� said Mr. Finn, who is now a distinguished fellow at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a Washington think tank.

Youngest Learners

Ms. Clinton鈥檚 office declined a request for an interview for this article. But ask anyone who has ever worked with her what piece of precollegiate policy is closest to her heart, and they鈥檒l answer: early-childhood education.

It鈥檚 an area that many politicians, including President Obama, have embraced in recent years.

One of Ms. Clinton鈥檚 earliest experiences with policy work came in researching health and educational conditions for the children of migrant workers as a summer employee for what became the Children鈥檚 Defense Fund.

In the 1980s, when future President Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas, Ms. Clinton was a driving force in bringing the Home Instruction Program for Parents of Preschool Youngsters to the state. Started in Israel, HIPPY offers home-visiting services to low-income parents.

Later, in the White House, Ms. Clinton helped push for the creation of Early Head Start, which expanded the preschool program for disadvantaged youngsters to children from birth to age 3. More recently, Ms. Clinton helped launch 鈥淭oo Small to Fail,鈥� an initiative aimed at promoting research into early brain development and other issues key to children in the birth-to-age 5 range.

In 2007, then-Sen. Clinton sought to add a new program to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that would have offered competitive grants to states to expand and beef up the quality of their early-childhood-education programs.

She pitched a similar proposal, with a $10 billion annual price tag, as a 2008 contender for the Democratic presidential nomination鈥攁n idea that the eventual nominee, Mr. Obama, also picked up on. President Obama has since made expanding early-childhood education a centerpiece of his second-term agenda.

But if Ms. Clinton, as a 2016 candidate, were to float a similar program, she鈥檇 likely get hit with big questions about its cost, said Frederick M. Hess, the director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, in Washington.

鈥淪he鈥檚 not somebody who has ever been bothered by budget constraints,鈥� contended Mr. Hess, who writes an opinion blog for the 澳门跑狗论坛 website. 鈥淚f you鈥檙e not a fiscal hawk, and especially if you鈥檙e not responsible for implementing these programs, it鈥檚 easy to be in favor of more funding for early childhood.鈥�

Merit-Pay Clash

During the 2008 presidential-primary season, teacher quality was the one corner of K-12 policy in which there was a clear divide between Ms. Clinton and Mr. Obama.

Unlike her rival, Ms. Clinton steered clear of pushing for merit pay for individual teachers, which she viewed as 鈥渄emeaning and discouraging.鈥�

Instead, she championed bonuses for entire staffs of schools that boasted significant gains in student achievement. Still, during a Democratic candidates鈥� debate in Las Vegas in 2007, she said it was important to 鈥渨eed out鈥� poor educators鈥攅ven in good schools.

By contrast, Mr. Obama spoke at the National Education Association annual convention earlier that year and suggested he would be open to basing teacher pay in part on student achievement. The policy later became a hallmark of his administration鈥檚 Race to the Top initiative. And the president鈥檚 waivers of parts of the No Child Left Behind Act, the current version of the ESEA, required states to craft evaluation systems that relied in significant part on student outcomes.

In the end, Ms. Clinton鈥檚 caution on a federal footprint in tying teacher pay to student test scores may prove to have been prescient: the Obama administration鈥檚 policy has helped fuel a backlash against high-stakes testing in general.

鈥淪he saw it then,鈥� Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, a 1.6 million-member union, said in an interview. 鈥淲hat鈥檚 really interesting is how many people on all sides of the political spectrum are cautioning against the federal role in teacher evaluation鈥� now.

But Mr. Hess, who watched the 2008 campaign closely, doesn鈥檛 think Ms. Clinton necessarily had foresight on where the policy would go. 鈥淪he was trying to plant herself as the more conventional liberal,鈥� he said.

Teacher Focus

The AFT endorsed Ms. Clinton in 2008, while the 3 million-member National Education Association opted not to pick a favorite during the primary season.

It鈥檚 far too soon to say whether the AFT would make the same endorsement this time around, Ms. Weingarten said鈥攖he union鈥檚 vetting process is extensive, and 2016 contenders are only beginning to emerge. But Ms. Clinton鈥檚 candidacy fired up AFT members in 2008, she said.

The AFT has had a good working relationship with both Clintons, dating back to when the late Albert Shanker was at the helm of the union, Ms. Weingarten said. And those ties endure: Bill Clinton鈥檚 current chief of staff, Tina Flournoy, was a top assistant to Ms. Weingarten at the AFT.

鈥淭here are many, many overlapping issues [of interest], and many, many overlapping values,鈥� Ms. Weingarten said. 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 mean we agree on everything.鈥�

To be sure, as a senator, Ms. Clinton worked with Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., now the chairman of the Senate education committee, on legislation to provide federal assistance to the Teach For America program, which both teachers鈥� unions are skeptical of.

And in a 2007 speech to the New York State United Teachers鈥� annual convention in Washington, Ms. Clinton affirmed her support for charter schools, to audible jeers.

More generally, teacher and principal development was a special focus of Ms. Clinton鈥檚 legislative agenda as a senator and her platform as presidential candidate, said Catherine Brown, a former aide to Ms. Clinton in the Senate and vice president of education policy at the Center for American Progress.

When Congress was at work in crafting the NCLB law in 2001, Ms. Clinton promoted 鈥淭ransition to Teaching,鈥� a grant program that sought to bolster alternative pathways into the profession. Later, she introduced bills on such matters as recruiting and training principals for high-need schools and creating a national teacher corps.

Ms. Clinton had a policy track record on teacher quality and academic standards and assessments even before she came to Washington.

In the 1980s, Bill Clinton was one of a pack of governors who took to heart the landmark 1983 report A Nation at Risk. He worked to increase the academic rigor in Arkansas鈥� education system, and Ms. Clinton was a key partner in that work. She led a statewide effort in Arkansas to bolster course offerings.

At the time, 187 of the state鈥檚 roughly 365 districts didn鈥檛 offer chemistry, and 163 offered no foreign language, said Don Ernst, who served as an adviser to the governor. Ms. Clinton traversed the state listening to recommendations and doing extensive outreach, he said. And later, she championed the proposals in the state legislature.

鈥淚 think a lot of people were thinking, 鈥榃hat does she know?鈥� 鈥� Mr. Ernst said. But the governor and Ms. Clinton 鈥渟pent a lot of time listening and communicating, and developed momentum,鈥� he said. 鈥淚t was actually pretty amazing.鈥�

And Ms. Clinton retained a belief in rigor: In the Senate, she introduced a measure in 2007 to create voluntary national standards in math and science, although the proposal never made it over the legislative finish line.

NCLB Views

In her first year as a senator, in 2001, Ms. Clinton, along with nearly everyone else in Congress, voted in favor of the No Child Left Behind Act, which was among President George W. Bush鈥檚 signature domestic-policy achievements.

But she raised a key question backstage: What would happen under the law鈥檚 accountability system to school districts like Scarsdale, N.Y., where nearly all the students were already proficient? What kind of sanctions might they face for not meeting the law鈥檚 achievement goals?

At the time, an aide to a Democratic member of the conference committee that was putting the finishing touches on the bill, was a bit surprised鈥攁fter all, the NCLB law was all about trying to improve outcomes for poor and minority students. Why was Sen. Clinton, who also represented poor and diverse communities like New York City鈥檚 South Bronx, asking about an affluent suburb?

But in retrospect, the former aide says, the exchange showed Ms. Clinton鈥檚 political acumen鈥攎uch of the pushback to the NCLB law and its system of tests and sanctions has stemmed from wealthy suburban communities like Scarsdale.

On the presidential-campaign trail in 2007, Ms. Clinton was critical of the Bush administration鈥檚 implementation of the law.

鈥淲e can all agree that we do need measures,鈥� she said in her New York State United Teachers speech. 鈥淲e do need accountability. But not the kind of accountability that the NCLB law has imposed on people. ... It鈥檚 time we had a president who cares more about learning than about memorizing.鈥�

At the time, the idea of paring back federally mandated tests wasn鈥檛 on the table in Washington in any serious way, but it鈥檚 become a hot issue in the current debate over rewriting the No Child Left Behind version of the ESEA. It鈥檚 an open question where Ms. Clinton stands on that issue.

Political Outlook

It鈥檚 unclear whether the next president will get to shape a reauthorization of the ESEA. Congress is now at work on revising the law, which is long overdue for renewal.

It might be a good thing for Ms. Clinton, as a prospective candidate, if the bill is over the finish line by the time she hits the campaign trail, said Andrew J. Rotherham, who served in the White House during President Bill Clinton鈥檚 tenure and is a co-founder of Bellwether Education Partners, a consulting organization in Washington. Should she win the Democratic nomination, her eventual GOP opponent would be almost sure to attack her on the federal role in education, he noted.

鈥淚t鈥檚 definitely more to her to advantage to have this done,鈥� Mr. Rotherham said. 鈥淔or some Republicans who want to run hard against Washington having [a still-pending ESEA bill] out there gives them one more target.鈥�