澳门跑狗论坛

Law & Courts

Supreme Court Won鈥檛 Take Up Case on District鈥檚 Gender Transition Policy

By Mark Walsh 鈥 December 09, 2024 4 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a case about a school district鈥檚 policy to support students undergoing gender transitions. But three justices said they would have taken up the challenge by a group of parents who contend the policy unconstitutionally excludes them from important decisions about their children.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., in a dissent from the denial of review joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, said the case 鈥減resents a question of great and growing national importance: whether a public school district violates parents鈥 fundamental constitutional right to make decisions concerning the rearing of their children 鈥 when, without parental knowledge or consent, it encourages a student to transition to a new gender or assists in that process.鈥

鈥淲e are told that more than 1,000 districts have adopted such policies,鈥 Alito said in the dissent in .

See also

Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Republican states are filing a barrage of legal challenges against the Biden administration's newly expanded campus sexual assault rules, saying they overstep the president's authority and undermine the Title IX anti-discrimination law.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Roughly 3 percent of high school students identify as transgender, and they face high levels of bullying and hopelessness, according to new data.
Patrick Orsagos/AP

At issue in the case is the 10,700-student Eau Claire district鈥檚 2021 administrative guidance on 鈥済ender identity support.鈥 The guidance calls for staff members to develop such plans 鈥渨hen appropriate or necessary鈥 for transgender, non-binary, or gender-nonconforming students. The plans might address restroom use, athletic participation, or social, medical, surgical, or legal processes.

Because some students are not open about their gender transitions at home, the policy contemplates instances in which parents would not be involved in creating the gender support plan.

Alito, in his dissent, highlighted a facilitator guide that said, 鈥淧arents are not entitled to know their kids鈥 identities. That knowledge must be earned.鈥

The guidance was challenged by an informal parents鈥 association, based on parents鈥 14th Amendment substantive-due-process right to control the upbringing of their children. But two lower courts did not rule on the merits of their challenge because they concluded that the parents鈥 group lacked standing to bring the suit.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in Chicago, held in March that parents could not challenge the district鈥檚 policy unless they could show that their child was transitioning or considering a gender transition.

Dissenting justices claim such policies 鈥榢eep parents in the dark鈥

In his dissent, Alito said 鈥渢he challenged policy and associated equity training specifically encourage school personnel to keep parents in the dark about the 鈥榠dentities鈥 of their children, especially if the school believes that the parents would not support what the school thinks is appropriate. Thus, the parents鈥 fear that the school district might make decisions for their children without their knowledge and consent is not speculative.鈥

Alito said he would grant review so the court could address lower courts鈥 questionable view of one of the Supreme Court鈥檚 key precedents on what gives someone appropriate standing to bring a lawsuit, which he said was leading some of those courts to avoid ruling on the merits of 鈥渟ome particularly contentious constitutional questions.鈥

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh indicated that he would grant review of the case, but he gave no explanation and he did not sign onto Alito鈥檚 dissent.

Last May, the Supreme Court declined to take up a similar case from Montgomery County, Md., in an appeal of a decision by a different federal appeals court that a parents鈥 group lacked standing to address that district鈥檚 gender support guidance. No member of the high court dissented from that action, in Parents 1 v. Montgomery County Board of Education.

In the Wisconsin case, the parents group, backed by the America First Legal Foundation, a conservative group led by Stephen Miller, who will soon be President-elect Donald Trump鈥檚 deputy chief of staff for domestic policy, and the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, a conservative group focused on the Badger state, argued to the high court that the 1,000 or more districts that have adopted gender support policies are doing so with the clear exclusion of parents from the process and even hiding important information about their children from them.

鈥淪chool is now like Las Vegas,鈥 . 鈥淲hat happens at school stays at school.鈥

See also

Parents, students, and staff of Chino Valley Unified School District hold up flags and signs in favor of protecting LGBTQ+ policies at the school board meeting held at Don Antonio Lugo High School on June 15, 2023, in Chino, Calif.
Parents, students, and staff of Chino Valley Unified School District hold up flags and signs in favor of protecting LGBTQ+ policies at a school board meeting on June 15, 2023, in Chino, Calif. The district is now suing Gov. Gavin Newsom over a new law banning districts from requiring educators to notify parents if their child requests to use a different name or pronouns in school.
Anjali Sharif-Paul/The Orange County Register via AP

The Eau Claire district, urging the court not to take up the case, said the parents鈥 group mischaracterized the administrative guidance. Even when a student does not want their parent to participate in a gender support plan, such plans are school records that are kept in the student鈥檚 files and would be available to parents at any time.

The parents鈥 group 鈥渂ased its lawsuit on a claim that at some unknown point in the future one of its members鈥 children might identify as transgender, and if so, they might request gender support from the district, and then, further, they might also request that the district not immediately notify their parent of these facts,鈥 the school district said in its brief. 鈥淸The parent group鈥檚] claim of possible future harm is completely dependent upon this highly attenuated chain of future possibilities that may never occur.鈥

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum Big AI Questions for Schools. How They Should Respond鈥
Join this free virtual event to unpack some of the big questions around the use of AI in K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM鈥檚 Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts High Court Won't Review School Admissions Policy That Sought to Boost Diversity
The U.S. Supreme Court refused a case about whether race was unconstitutionally considered in admissions to Boston's selective schools.
5 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to take up a case about the Boston district鈥檚 facially race-neutral admissions policy for selective magnet high schools.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Case on Medical Care for Trans Youth Could Impact School Sports
The justices weigh a Tennessee law that bars certain medical treatments for transgender minors, with school issues bubbling around the case.
8 min read
Transgenders rights supporters rally outside of the Supreme Court, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024, in Washington.
Transgender rights supporters rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 4 as the court weighed a Tennessee law that restricts certain medical treatments for transgender minors.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts How a Supreme Court Case on Vaping Stands to Impact Schools
The U.S. Supreme Court heard an important case about federal regulation of flavored e-cigarettes, which remain a concern for schools.
6 min read
A high school principal displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in such places as restrooms or hallways at a school in Massachusetts on April 10, 2018.
A high school principal in Massachusetts displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in restrooms or hallways on April 10, 2018.
Steven Senne/AP
Law & Courts Billions of School Tech Dollars At Risk as Supreme Court Takes Up E-Rate Case
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a lower-court decision that struck down the funding mechanism for the E-rate school internet program.
3 min read
digital citizenship computer phone 1271520062
solarseven/iStock/Getty