澳门跑狗论坛

6    That鈥檚 the number of states where funding dropped by more than 10 percent between 2008 and 2020. They are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, and Wyoming. More than a dozen others saw level funding or drops of up to 10 percent during that period.

18    The percentage decrease in Florida鈥檚 funding for school districts between 2008 and 2020, from $14,065 per pupil to $11,509 per pupil. That鈥檚 the largest drop of any state.

11    The number of states where average funding per pupil fell short of the national average by more than $3,000. Districts in Arizona and Nevada, the two states with the lowest per-pupil funding on average, got more than $5,000 less per student than the national average, which was $15,446 per student.

$16,000    The approximate difference in average per-pupil funding between the states with the lowest and highest funding levels. At the low end, Arizona and Nevada districts get an average of $10,244 per student. Districts in New York and Vermont, the two highest-spending states, get between $23,000 and $26,000 per student on average.

1    The number of states this year that received an 鈥淔鈥� grade from the Education Law Center on all three metrics (funding level, funding distribution, and funding effort). That dubious honor goes to Nevada.

1    The number of states that received an 鈥淎鈥� grade on all three metrics this year. The honor goes to Wyoming. Even there, though, satisfaction with school funding isn鈥檛 universal. The state teachers鈥� union is for allegedly failing to meet its constitutional obligation to fund schools adequately. A judge recently to dismiss the case.

8    The number of states that scored an F on two of three metrics. Nine states scored an A on two of three metrics.

12    The number of states that scored an A or B on the crucial equity metric of funding distribution. Ten states scored an F.

31    The number of states that lack school funding systems that direct more resources to districts with large shares of students living in poverty.

6    The number of states where high-poverty districts get at least 20 percent fewer dollars per pupil than low-poverty districts. For instance, in New Hampshire, low-poverty districts get an average of $19,121 per pupil, while high-poverty districts get $13,923.

$19,000    The gap between the states with the highest and lowest average funding for high-poverty districts. It鈥檚 even more vast than the gap between average school funding for states regardless of poverty level. Nevada spends slightly less than $10,000 per pupil on average for low-poverty districts, while Wyoming spends close to $29,000.

4    The percentage of gross domestic product that states with an A or B grade for effort devoted to public schools. Eleven states devote more than 4 percent of that figure to public schools. Nine states, meanwhile, dedicate less than 3 percent of their GDP to school spending.

$752 billion    The amount of additional money schools would have received nationwide if all states had maintained their 2008 level of effort through 2020. That鈥檚 roughly equivalent to the total annual amount spent on public schools in the United States, including federal, state, and local dollars.

32    The number of states that would have been offering more funding per pupil now if they had maintained their 2008 level of effort through 2020. In 13 states, that figure would have grown by more than $2,000 per pupil.

49    The number of states that saw general fund revenue for the most recent fiscal year that exceeded their budget predictions, according to the . In some cases, the final total came in more than 20 percent above what was expected. Those figures are already spurring advocates in many states to push for substantial increases in funding for K-12 schools.