With the addition of three longtime holdouts to the list of states seeking , nearly every state has sought to design its own accountability system to replace the outdated federal law.
But the waiver applications submitted last month by Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wyoming are by no means a sure thing.
Neither Pennsylvania nor Wyoming had released its submitted application to the public as of late last week, despite a federal requirement that states collaborate with stakeholders on their new proposed accountability systems.
And that generally addresses the requirements of the U.S. Department of Education, but omits some key promises and elements that federal officials require as a condition of receiving flexibility.
Nonetheless, 鈥渢hese requests reflect the desire of states to have more flexibility in implementing their locally developed ideas about how to improve education鈥攁nd not be forced into a one-size-fits-all approach,鈥� U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said when the applications were submitted Feb. 28.
So far, 34 states and the District of Columbia have secured waivers from certain provisions of the NCLB law, the current version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which is long overdue for a congressional rewrite.
Texas鈥� request for flexibility under the No Child Left Behind Act does not follow federal officials鈥� standard format. The request focuses on three areas:
Academic Standards: The state has fully implemented the Texas College and Career Readiness Standards, which have been signed off on by its higher education institutions.
Differentiated Accountability: A new school rating system with tiered interventions will debut in the 2013-14 school year, based on Texas鈥� new testing system, which is intended to incorporate better measures of student growth beginning in the fall.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation: The state plans to fully implement statewide, in the 2015-16 school year, a new teacher-evaluation system that incorporates a value-added measure of student growth for individual teachers. A new principal-evaluation system will be piloted during the 2014-15 school year.
SOURCE: Texas Education Agency
Ten states have applications pending, while applications from Iowa and California were rejected by federal officials over problems implementing new teacher-evaluation guidelines.
North Dakota last week joined Vermont on the very short list of states that tried for waivers but withdrew their requests after it became clear federal officials weren鈥檛 likely to accept their plans.
Only Montana and Nebraska have not tried to apply for a waiver.
Practically speaking, last month鈥檚 fourth-round application deadline might have been the last for states to apply for waivers鈥攅specially if they want relief from the law before the next school year starts. The approval process typically has taken many months.
Mr. Duncan signaled as much when he said recently that after this fourth-round application deadline had come and gone, he would consider the unusual waiver request from 10 California districts that want to design their own accountability plan and receive a special waiver from the Education Department.
The fact that Texas even applied is noteworthy, given that the Lone Star State has shunned some recent high-profile federal education initiatives and priorities. The state did not compete in any Race to the Top competition, for example, and has not adopted the federally supported Common Core State Standards.
Current Law Obsolete
But the current federal accountability law has become obsolete, said Texas Commissioner of Education Michael L. Williams.
鈥淐urrently, school districts across Texas are forced to operate within two, often conflicting, accountability and intervention systems while taking valuable resources and time away from focusing on improving student achievement,鈥� Mr. Williams said in a statement when the application was made. He was not available for further comment.
But the state鈥檚 application comes with a significant catch: It鈥檚 asking for flexibility under Mr. Duncan鈥檚 general waiver authority, and outside the formal, conditional process the federal department set up for states.
The formal waiver process says that in exchange for flexibility to reset its academic goals for schools, a state has to agree to a host of requirements鈥攆rom identifying for interventions schools with the largest achievement gaps to creating teacher-evaluation systems tied to student academic growth and used to inform personnel decisions.
The Texas application has many of the required core components鈥攕uch as adopting standards for college and career readiness (though not the common core), creating a differentiated accountability system, and using student growth in its teacher-evaluation system.
Missing Elements
But the application appears to be missing a few elements as well, such as how its new evaluation system will be used to inform personnel decisions and exactly what its new academic goals will be for schools and individual subgroups of students.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a good starting point. But I am doubtful that the [federal] department would approve it in its current form,鈥� said Anne Hyslop, a policy analyst at the New America Foundation, a Washington think tank.
鈥淭here are too many unanswered questions about their proposed accountability system,鈥� she said. 鈥淭here would have to be a significant back and forth between Texas and the department to get it to a place where it could be approved.鈥�
The federal Education Department had no comment on Texas鈥� application.
Much less is known about applications from Pennsylvania and Wyoming since those states had not released to the public what they have submitted.
Wyoming education deparment spokesman Tom Lacock said his state has received an extension from federal officials to keep working on its application. The state, in particular, wants relief from the escalating student-achievement goals that will top out at 100 percent proficiency in reading and math next school year, Wyoming education officials have said.
Keystone State Questions
Pennsylvania has publicized an overview of its proposed plan, which indicates that state offcials want to use a 100-point rating system for schools based on tests in reading, writing, math, and science. Schools would be rated on achievement status, growth, reducing achievement gaps, and other factors, including graduation rate.
But the state has not released its entire application. Pennsylvania education department spokesman Tim Eller said that the application isn鈥檛 done yet, and that state officials are consulting with the federal department as they finish it.
While advocacy groups in both Pennsylvania and Wyoming have been quiet about the lack of public discussion on details of the applications, federal officials will be posting those states鈥� submissions online鈥攁s they have with all other NCLB waiver applications鈥攊n the coming days.
In Pennsylvania, at least, there hasn鈥檛 been an outcry for flexibility from the NCLB law, said Lawrence Feinberg, a member of the Keystone State Education Coalition, which is a group of school board members and administrators who favor local control of schools. Nor, he said, has there been virtually any public discussion about a waiver.
鈥淚 think people have gotten pretty accustomed to all of their schools being labeled failing by now,鈥� Mr. Feinberg said. 鈥淭he law has lost credibility.鈥�
