Saying he had to go where the money is, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper has proposed cutting K-12 spending in 2011-12 by $322 million from current levels.
If approved by the legislature, the cuts would drop school spending to 2007-08 levels and reduce average per-pupil funding from $6,823 this school year to $6,326.
Total program spending鈥攖he combination of state and local funds used to pay for basic school operations鈥攚ould drop from $5.4 billion this year to about $5.1 billion. And the governor鈥檚 K-12 spending plan would be $836 million below what full funding would be under the terms of Amendment 23.
鈥淭he largest single area of reduction is K-12 education,鈥� Hickenlooper told members of the Joint Budget Committee and a crowd packed into the Capitol鈥檚 largest hearing room Tuesday.
In a letter to the JBC, Hickenlooper noted that while revenue to the state鈥檚 general fund has grown only $481 million since 2000-01, general fund spending for K-12 has increased by about $800 million.
He repeatedly used the word 鈥渦nsustainable鈥� when discussing the budget situation.
Speaking to reporters later in the afternoon, Hickenlooper said, 鈥�41 percent of the state budget is in K-12 education. 鈥� It鈥檚 where the money is. 鈥� The four-letter word in the room is math.鈥�
While serious cuts of some level weren鈥檛 unexpected, education leaders and Democratic legislators reacted with dismay, some hinting they will do what they can to minimize the reductions. Senate Republicans have made protecting education a priority and have even introduced a bill that would create an income tax checkoff to raise money for schools.
Republican legislative leaders praised Hickenlooper鈥檚 calls for fiscal responsibility and economic development but didn鈥檛 wring their hands about education cuts.
The announcement also brought renewed calls from Democrats and civic groups for a voter-approved solution to Colorado鈥檚 fiscal system.
Cuts Have Been Building
Because of the budget crunch, the 2010 legislature approved funding lower than the $5.8 million that would have been required had the full Amendment 23 formula been applied.
About a quarter of school funding is allocated based on what are called 鈥渇actors鈥濃�攄istrict size, numbers of at-risk students and personnel costs.
The legislature last year created a new 鈥渂udget stabilization factor,鈥� a mathematical device that allows lawmakers to reduce the amount of money spent on other factors and thereby giving wide flexibility in cutting K-12 spending.
Last year鈥檚 school finance law also determined that Amendment 23鈥檚 requirements that school spending must increase annually by inflation and enrollment apply only to base school funding, about 75 percent of the total.
Even before the law was changed last year, the legislature had been shaving school funding in response to budget pressures. In 2009-10 total program funding was about $5.6 billion, not the $5.7 billion called for by the old interpretation of Amendment 23. Average per-pupil funding was $7,075.
School districts have responded to the tightening of state aid with a variety of tactics, including use of reserves, pay freezes, some layoffs and increased class sizes. Districts already are planning their 2011-12 budgets, and the announcement of Hickenlooper鈥檚 budget gives them a clearer target to shoot for.
Given that financial health and funding levels vary district to district, it鈥檚 difficult to say now what the effect will be on individual districts. As Colorado Education Association President Beverly Ingle noted, 鈥淐EA can鈥檛 predict yet the exact impact in each district but we can absolutely say that it will be profound.鈥�
The final decision on the budget rests with legislature and won鈥檛 be made until sometime in April, after official quarterly revenue forecasts are released in late March. (Hickenlooper said Thursday he doesn鈥檛 expect those forecasts will differ much from the December forecast on which his budget plan is based.)
Some lawmakers politely pushed back at the idea of school cuts during the governor鈥檚 meeting with the JBC.
鈥淭here are things I question whether they are feasible or wise,鈥� said Pat Steadman, D-Denver.
鈥淭his is a plan. We鈥檙e open to working with you,鈥� Hickenlooper replied.
Hickenlooper had additional bad news in his formal letter to the JBC. 鈥淎s we look ahead to FY 2012-13, it is likely additional budget reductions beyond those in this plan will be necessary.鈥�
Other Cuts
A key part of Hickenlooper鈥檚 plan is maintaining the general fund reserve at 4 percent rather than the 2 percent sometimes used in times of economic stress. While some education advocates may push for a 2 percent reserve, Hickenlooper points out that would free up only about $100 million.
The governor also proposes to reduce the amount the state contributes to employee pensions (including for many workers in higher education but not for teachers) by 4.5 percent and increase employee payroll deductions by the same percentage.
In the Department of Education, the governor proposes to take $3.2 million from the Read-to-Achieve program and $1 million from the Colorado Counselor Corps, plus elimination of the School Leadership Academy board.
