澳门跑狗论坛

Law & Courts

Billions of School Tech Dollars At Risk as Supreme Court Takes Up E-Rate Case

By Mark Walsh 鈥 November 22, 2024 3 min read
digital citizenship computer phone 1271520062
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up a major case about the constitutionality of the funding mechanism for the Universal Service Fund, which distributes some $4 billion annually under the E-rate program for connecting schools and libraries to the internet.

The justices on Nov. 22 granted appeals by the Federal Communications Commission and the Schools, Health, and Libraries Broadband Coalition of a federal appeals court ruling that struck down the funding mechanism as a 鈥渕isbegotten鈥 and unconstitutional tax on consumers.

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, telephone and cable companies make required contributions to the Universal Service Fund, which through a private entity distributes money to schools and other recipients. The companies pass along such costs to their customers.

鈥淎merican telecommunications consumers are subject to a multibillion-dollar tax nobody voted for,鈥 said by the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, 鈥淭he size of that tax is de facto determined by a trade group staffed by industry insiders with no semblance of accountability to the public.鈥

The practical effect of the 5th Circuit ruling has been limited thus far. While the decision on the constitutionality of the funding mechanism was sweeping, the appeals court delayed the effect of its decision, and the E-rate program has continued to operate normally.

In August, FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called the 5th Circuit decision 鈥渕isguided.鈥 And a coalition of more than a dozen education organizations, including the Consortium for School Networking and AASA, the School Superintendents Association, called the ruling 鈥渁bsurd.鈥

The FCC and the broadband coalition each asked the Supreme Court to take up the case.

The 5th Circuit decision 鈥渢hreatens to nullify the universal service programs鈥攖o the detriment of the millions of Americans whom those programs serve,鈥 U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar told the justices .

The broadband coalition said that the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision casts 鈥渄oubt on billions of dollars in telecommunications subsidies that strengthen the networks that serve as critical lifelines鈥 to schools and libraries and other Universal Service Fund recipients.

Challengers agree to have justices take up their issue

The funding mechanism was challenged by the Vienna, Va.-based watchdog group Consumers鈥 Research, which contends that the USF funding mechanism is an unprecedented and illegal delegation of federal taxing power to an 鈥渦nelected agency bureaucracy.鈥

The group filed several challenges around the country, and two other federal appeals courts had upheld the funding mechanism, and the Supreme Court declined to review those decisions earlier this year.

But with the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision creating a clear circuit split, Consumers鈥 Research essentially agreed that the Supreme Court should take up the issue.

鈥淭he challengers agree the constitutionality of the USF funding mechanism warrants this court鈥檚 review,鈥 Consumers鈥 Research .

There is one wrinkle that came with the Supreme Court鈥檚 order granting review. The justices asked the parties to also address the question of whether the case is moot because the challengers鈥 failed to seek certain forms of preliminary relief before the 5th Circuit.

It isn鈥檛 entirely clear what the court means by that, because the parties didn鈥檛 address that question in their preliminary briefing. But it could give the court an off-ramp for disposing of the case without any major disruption to the USF and the E-rate program.

The case will likely be argued next March or April and decided by the end of the current term next June. The petitions are and .

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum Big AI Questions for Schools. How They Should Respond鈥
Join this free virtual event to unpack some of the big questions around the use of AI in K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM鈥檚 Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Won't Take Up Case on District's Gender Transition Policy
The U.S. Supreme Court declined an appeal from a parents' group contending that a district's policy on gender support plans excludes them.
4 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to hear a case about a school district鈥檚 policy to support students undergoing gender transitions.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts High Court Won't Review School Admissions Policy That Sought to Boost Diversity
The U.S. Supreme Court refused a case about whether race was unconstitutionally considered in admissions to Boston's selective schools.
5 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to take up a case about the Boston district鈥檚 facially race-neutral admissions policy for selective magnet high schools.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Case on Medical Care for Trans Youth Could Impact School Sports
The justices weigh a Tennessee law that bars certain medical treatments for transgender minors, with school issues bubbling around the case.
8 min read
Transgenders rights supporters rally outside of the Supreme Court, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024, in Washington.
Transgender rights supporters rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 4 as the court weighed a Tennessee law that restricts certain medical treatments for transgender minors.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts How a Supreme Court Case on Vaping Stands to Impact Schools
The U.S. Supreme Court heard an important case about federal regulation of flavored e-cigarettes, which remain a concern for schools.
6 min read
A high school principal displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in such places as restrooms or hallways at a school in Massachusetts on April 10, 2018.
A high school principal in Massachusetts displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in restrooms or hallways on April 10, 2018.
Steven Senne/AP