The for-profit education company Apollo Group Inc. will be required to pay a $9.8 million fine to the U.S. Department of Education, after the agency recently concluded that the University of Phoenix, a subsidiary of the company, violated federal regulations that prohibit tying employee pay to student enrollment.
Even though it agreed to pay the fine, the Phoenix-based Apollo Group denied any wrongdoing.
Read the related story,
A 45-page Education Department report, obtained by 澳门跑狗论坛 under the Freedom of Information Act, says that University of Phoenix recruiters worked in a high-pressure sales environment and were paid solely according to how many students they enrolled. It also details what the department contends were management鈥檚 aggressive tactics to meet enrollment quotas as well as practices to deceive federal regulators.
鈥淢any [recruiters] expressed that while uop at one time focused on the student and stressed ethical conduct, the culture now is one where the emphasis is on increasing numbers, the stock price, and meeting Wall Street鈥檚 expectations,鈥� the report says.
But the Apollo Group disagreed with the findings.
鈥淭he department鈥檚 report was preliminary and most of the allegations 鈥� were subsequently proven to be false, misleading, or inaccurate,鈥� Terri Bishop, the senior vice president of public affairs for the company, said in a written statement.
Education Department officials were unavailable for comment last week.
The $9.8 million settlement comes on top of another $4.4 million the company must pay the Education Department after the agency audited the Apollo Group鈥檚 Institute for Professional Development.
The university鈥檚 student enrollment has skyrocketed from 17,571 in 1991 to more than 323,000 this year. The university, which teaches working adults, has 150 campuses in 30 states, Puerto Rico, Canada, and online.
The amount of federal aid its students received rose from $338 million in 1999 to $869 million last year, and the default rate on uop students鈥� loans grew from 4.6 percent to 5.8 percent from 1999 to 2001.
Revenue has also risen dramatically for the company, from $69 million in 1991 to $1.3 billion last year. The company鈥檚 stock price fell 7 percent to $72.85 per share last week.
