The mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas, has added new fuel to long-running conversations about drills schools use to prepare for shootings: how to help students develop routines they can rely on in case of crisis without traumatizing them.
The May 24 attack鈥攊n which an 18-year-old gunman killed 19 elementary school students and two teachers鈥攕parked a new round of debates over school safety, and how regularly students should prepare for the devastating but statistically unlikely event of a mass shooting at their school.
On one side: advocates for 鈥渉ardening schools鈥 have pushed for exercises that teach students how to jump out of classroom windows and even fight back by throwing objects like erasers and books at an attacker. In recent years, some school districts have even added elements to their drills intended to make them seem more like a real attack: the sound of real gunfire, officers through school hallways, and the use of prop or toy firearms.
On the other end of the spectrum, some advocates for stricter gun laws have long questioned the value of student drills, saying they put the burden of responding to gun violence on the backs of children whose school experiences have been changed by the routines.
鈥淚 would love to live in a world where we did not need these [drills], but that鈥檚 not the world we live in,鈥 said said Jaclyn Schildkraut, an associate professor of criminal justice at the State University of New York at Oswego who studies mass shootings and school drills. 鈥淪o how can we do them in a way that is both trauma-informed, and also delivering the skills that students need to have in these moments?鈥
States limit, clarify purpose of school shooter drills
After years of encouraging schools to better prepare for possible shootings, some states鈥攎ost recently Washington and New Jersey鈥攈ave moved to more clearly define what sorts of student drills are appropriate and effective.
State lawmakers have sought to limit realistic simulations, which draw criticism from safety experts and child well-being researchers.
鈥淵ou can prepare your kids for a house fire by telling them where to meet and how to climb out of their windows,鈥 Washington state Rep. Amy Walen, a Democrat, said in a January committee meeting. 鈥淏ut you don鈥檛 have to burn the house down to show them how to escape a house fire safely.鈥
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, signed a Walen-sponsored bill into law on March 17, making his state the most recent to take action on the issue. The measure prohibits school drills from including 鈥渓ive simulations of or reenactments of active shooter scenarios that are not trauma-informed and age and developmentally appropriate.鈥
Walen, originally proposed fully prohibiting drills 鈥渂ased on active shooter scenarios.鈥 Instead, she said, schools should limit themselves to rehearsing simple lockdown procedures that could be used in a variety of emergency situations.
After some school administrators pushed back, saying that restriction was too broad, she amended her bill to focus on her most acute concerns. Parents and students, including her own nephew, had told her drills that too closely mimicked a real-life attack were unnecessarily distressing, Walen said.
Other states have passed similar measures in recent years.
Bills passed in Virginia since 2017 require schools to notify parents in advance of drills and to exempt kindergarten and prekindergarten students from participating for the first 60 days of a new school year. Alabama passed a law in 2019 that changes a state requirement for 鈥渃ode red drills鈥 designed to respond to active shooters to more general 鈥渓ockdown drills.鈥
A new law in New Jersey, signed in January, requires school drills to be age-appropriate, and it prohibits role-playing 鈥渢he use of fake blood, real or prop firearms, or the simulations of gunshots, explosions, or other sounds or visuals that may induce panic or a traumatic response from a student or school district employee.鈥
Lockdown drills vs. active shooter drills
School shootings, especially rampage-style attacks as in Uvalde, are statistically rare. But the emotionally impactful nature of such events often drives school safety debates and legislative responses.
As parents and policymakers around the country have called for action following high-profile school shootings in places like Uvalde, Newtown, Conn., and Santa Fe, Texas, the use of school drills鈥攁nd state laws that mandate them鈥攈as grown.
Ninety-six percent of public schools reported having written procedures for active shooter drills in the 2019-20 school year, according to the . That was up from 79 percent in 2003-04. Ninety-eight percent of schools reported procedures for lockdown drills, a term some educational administrators use synonymously with active shooter drills.
The broad variation in how educators and policymakers use those terms matches a similar variation in what schools deem appropriate, said Schildkraut, the professor who studies drills. Sometimes, she鈥檚 even found vastly different practices in different schools in the same district.
The drills most supported by research are simple lockdown procedures during which students lock classroom doors, shut off lights, stand out of view from any windows, and stay silent, Schildkraut said.
Such procedures could be used in the case of a gunman on campus, but they could also be relied upon if a wild animal enters the building or as a response to any range of unforeseen possibilities, she said.
Administrators err when they think they must familiarize students with the sound of real gun fire or use scare tactics to get them to take drills seriously, Schildkraut said. Those practices don鈥檛 take into account students鈥 personal histories with trauma or exposure to gun violence in their communities.
鈥淭he goals of a drill are to build muscle memory so that if there is ever an emergency鈥攚hatever the situation is鈥攊f there is any kind of impairment from stress or whatever, your body will take over and do what it鈥檚 supposed to do,鈥 Schildkraut said. 鈥淭he theatrics and everything else is simply not needed to achieve that muscle memory.鈥
In 2020, the National Association of School Psychologists and the National Association of School Resource Officers issued joint. That guidance stressed the importance of lockdown procedures and stressed that simulations should be used to train adults, like law enforcement officers, not students.
Run, hide, fight?
Washington state will release guidance for districts that more clearly defines what is 鈥渁ge-appropriate鈥 before its new law goes into effect this month, said Lee Collyer, director of school health and student safety for the state鈥檚 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
That guidance won鈥檛 ban one practice the bill鈥檚 supporters criticized: teaching students how to barricade a classroom door with desks and other furniture. Such a practice will be allowed as long as it is not done as part of a shooting simulation, Collyer said.
Barricading classrooms is one step in multi-option response drills, also known as 鈥渞un, hide, fight鈥 or ALICE, an acronym for alert, lockdown, inform, counter, evacuate training that was developed by a former law enforcement officer.
Those protocols teach students practices like how to escape out of classroom windows, how to secure classrooms, and even how to fight back by throwing objects like books and staplers at intruders.
School safety experts say such practices aren鈥檛 backed by evidence and may increase the chances a student is harmed鈥攑hysically or emotionally鈥攄uring training. There is also wide variability in how private instructors teach some practices, which is why some schools that participate have drawn national headlines for asking students to stockpile or buckets of to hurl at would-be attackers.
Michael Olsen, superintendent of the Kettle Falls School District in rural Washington, spoke against the original version of Walen鈥檚 bill. Rural schools like his need to give students options to respond in crisis situations, including shootings, because longer travel distances mean law enforcement officers are often slower to respond, he told lawmakers.
鈥淲e could be looking at 10 to 15 minutes before we have any law enforcement on site,鈥 Kettle told 澳门跑狗论坛.
Olsen said he鈥檚 satisfied with the final text of the new law, under which students at Kettle Falls can still practice 鈥渄angerous intruder鈥 procedures. Younger students largely practice lockdown protocols and discuss other options, like evacuation, with teachers. Older students may practice stacking furniture or discuss what they could use as a projectile to distract an attacker, Olsen said.
鈥淭hese kind of drills, done incorrectly, could be horribly traumatizing to students and staff,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he language that was actually passed is easy to support.鈥
Schildkraut said some multi-option response practices aren鈥檛 supported by evidence, and some are instinctive to students, even without practice. She supports practicing procedures for locking down, evacuating, and sheltering in place as discrete practices. But practices need to help students avoid confusion and focus on waiting for instructions from an adult, she said.
Emotional conversations
Schildkraut has researched effective drill practices at the Syracuse City School District in New York, where she has conducted over 300 lockdown practices in four years.
Lockdown drills can be done very calmly and routinely in a way that doesn鈥檛 affect students emotionally, she said.
With consistent practices, she has found students and educators can closely adhere to best practices. Her drills involve quietly closing doors, shutting off lights, standing quietly out of view, and responding to law enforcement, which she simulates with a gentle knock on the door.
Surveying 6th- through 12-grade students before and after participation, Schildkraut found that more respondents felt prepared after a drill, but they also reported a lower sense of safety at school.
In a that summarized her findings, Schildkraut attributed that response to 鈥減rotection motivation theory,鈥 which suggests that 鈥渋n order for people to engage in protective behavior, they have to perceive that there is some kind of threat.鈥
In other words, learning about why drills are necessary made students more aware of potential dangers, she said. But that motivation can come through a careful discussion, Schildkraut insisted, and students don鈥檛 need dramatic theatrics to take preparation seriously.
While state laws have focused the most on addressing simulations, some educators, and some state lawmakers, have said all student drills can lead to possible trauma.
鈥淪chool shootings are rare, and we should probably not prepare our children to be anxious and afraid at schools,鈥 Lake Washington, Wash., school psychologist Kathryn Salveson said as she testified in support of the Washington bill last year.
She particularly condemned 鈥渟ensorial experiences,鈥 like actors and the sounds of screaming, which are not backed by research.
She cited a by researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology, who analyzed 54 million social media posts before and after various kinds of shooting drills at 114 schools in 33 states.
The researchers trained machine-learning software to detect common language associated with depression and anxiety, filtering the social media posts for indicators of mental health concerns.
The study鈥攚hich received funding from Everytown for Gun Safety, an organization that has advocated for tougher gun laws and has criticized school safety drills鈥攆ound about 40 percent increases in the proportion of posts that suggested stress, anxiety, and depression after students participated in drills.
Schildkraut urged some caution in analyzing the results. Students may be less motivated to share online after an unremarkable, routine drill than after a drill that was poorly conducted or traumatizing, she said.
Still, it鈥檚 important that lawmakers and educators are thoughtful about how they prepare students, she said.
Schildkraut, who has studied shootings for 15 years, recently observed a simulation drill with law enforcement. She had prepared herself for the presence of armed officers and the appearance of fake blood鈥攁 mix of food coloring and Dial hand soap鈥 but she did not anticipate her response to the sounds of actors screaming.
The researcher, who grew up in Parkland, Fla., which was the site of a mass school shooting in 2018, had to leave the building to regroup.
鈥淎ll I could think of was, 鈥極h my God. This is what was going on in that school,鈥欌 she said.