On April 18, we published 鈥�,鈥� an editorial in our school newspaper on being denied entry to a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos in our hometown of Lexington, Ky. Our editorial focused on the fact that we were denied entry as students to an event that was about students鈥� education. Even though it was an open-press event, we weren鈥檛 allowed in because we hadn鈥檛 RSVP鈥檇鈥攕omething we didn鈥檛 know we were supposed to do. We invite you to read our piece, but for us this story is now about something even bigger.
On April 19, the Lexington Herald-Leader, our local paper, . Three days later, we heard the news that The Washington Post published its own piece about our experience. In the moment, it was hard to wrap our heads around the attention we were receiving. The piece went 鈥渧iral,鈥� with more than 12,000 hits on our website in seven days. We reached a wider audience than we ever imagined.
A few days later, we were still trying to process that we had been recognized by The Washington Post when we received word via Twitter that CNN covered our editorial as well. Sitting in Abigail鈥檚 driveway, our heads spinning in disbelief, we saw on Apple News that USA Today wrote about our experience. We couldn鈥檛 believe it.
That night, we spoke with Olivia鈥檚 parents about our accomplishments, and the heights we had reached. We discussed the ups and downs of the day, relaying all that we could remember. It felt as though the entire week had been crammed into one day; it was all such a blur.
We are grateful for our unexpected national and international platform, but this experience has had its highs and lows. We were excited to spread our message, but we have been saddened to find that most of the media outlets who covered our story sidestepped us.
We feel our story may have been co-opted to create a narrative we did not intend. The headlines in much of the media coverage used words like bashing, blast, and slam, suggesting that we were attacking DeVos. We did not want our editorial to be partisan in any way or make it appear as though we meant harm.
These publications misconstrued our words. We just wanted to relay our experience of trying to emphasize what happens all too often to students: We鈥檙e shut out of conversations when it comes to discussion about what鈥檚 best for us. We want our seat at the table.
While we are extremely grateful to the media organizations that picked up our story, we don鈥檛 know if they fully got our message. Through all of the hype, our firsthand account hasn鈥檛 been put into context.
Getting the facts about our experience out to the world and getting people to hear our story was our goal. None of the publications asked to meet us or discuss our issues. It was yet another instance where we were denied our voice.
And we still haven鈥檛 gotten an answer to the questions our editorial asked: Why did a roundtable discussion on education require an invitation, and why were no public school educators invited? The U.S. Department of Education as 鈥渁 conversation on education freedom and the importance of giving every student in Kentucky the opportunity to access the education option that works best for them.鈥�
We understand that many believe we as students do not have the same power that adults do. Although we are young journalists, we have the same passion as professional journalists. The adults in power are doing exactly the opposite of what we intended, which was to use our voice. As a result, we haven鈥檛 been able to control our own narrative. It鈥檚 important for adults to remember that we have things we want to say, and maybe they should consider the fact that the faults in education are because no one asks us what actually works for us.
But not all adults didn鈥檛 listen to us. The campus that hosted the event鈥攖he Bluegrass Community and Technical College鈥攃alled us and met with us to discuss our experience. We met with the college鈥檚 president and a member of the school鈥檚 communication team. (We hope they鈥檙e considering our suggestion that they no longer agree to hold these types of closed events on their campus.) We even received an encouraging message from 2009 Pulitzer Prize editorial writing winner Mark Mahoney.
With help from other groups in the community such as The Kentucky Coalition for Open Government who answered our questions about open meetings law, we were able to update our story. Lexington Herald-Leader reporter Valarie Honeycutt-Spears shared contact information for the U.S. Secretary of Education鈥檚 office to help us update.
We are humbled for being told that we have inspired so many people. Knowing that our words have made such an impact is mind-blowing. However, our position hasn鈥檛 changed. We are still longing for a voice for students and any stakeholders in public education.
