Marilyn Stewart fairly unseated incumbent Deborah Lynch in the contest for president of the Chicago Teachers Union and should be recognized immediately as its new head, the local union鈥檚 national parent announced Aug. 6.
The American Federation of Teachers found 鈥渘o grounds for overturning鈥� the June 11 runoff election, which Ms. Stewart appeared to win by a narrow margin. The results of that vote, however, were tossed out by a union committee under Ms. Lynch, which cited evidence of possible fraud and also called for a new election.
鈥淎lthough many allegations of fraud and other improprieties were made by Deborah Lynch, after exhaustive review of the facts and far-reaching opportunity provided to Ms. Lynch and her attorneys to demonstrate purported fraud, [the AFT investigation committee] ... found no evidence of ballot tampering, fraud, or any other wrongdoing,鈥� the national union said in a statement.
|
The committee also obliquely reprimanded Ms. Lynch鈥檚 team for the way it tried to nullify the election. 鈥淭he process by which certain information regarding alleged election improprieties was collected and presented to [the local committee that invalidated the election] was fundamentally flawed and lacked due process,鈥� the statement complained. AFT leaders met with the two rivals early on Aug. 6 to reveal the committee鈥檚 decision, which had the endorsement of the national union鈥檚 executive committee.
鈥淚t was a remarkably smooth transition,鈥� said Alex Wohl, a spokesman for the AFT. 鈥淒eborah Lynch agreed to assist with the transition. It began immediately.鈥�
Despite that agreement, Ms. Lynch made clear that she disagreed with the outcome, claiming that the AFT did not have the right to overturn decisions made by separate CTU committees to invalidate the election results and to call a new election.
鈥淲e disagree strongly with the AFT decision for its complete lack of attention to the evidence at hand and for its total disregard of the sovereignty of the CTU and the integrity of its processes,鈥� Ms. Lynch said in a statement.
Nevertheless, she said, 鈥渨e will abide by the AFT鈥檚 decision and step aside.鈥�
At the same time, Ms. Lynch noted that her slate would bring the election fraud issues to the attention of the U.S. Department of Labor.
Aspects of Conflict
The nation鈥檚 third-largest teachers鈥� local, with 33,000 members, has been riven by conflict since late June when the union committee declared the election invalid.
With Ms. Lynch claiming she should stay in office until a new election, the two sides battled over the CTU鈥檚 offices, purse strings, and representation at the national convention in July.
|
Ms. Stewart, whose faction had run the union for 30 years before Ms. Lynch鈥檚 upset victory in 2001, asked the AFT to investigate Ms. Lynch鈥檚 charges of fraud.
In response, the AFT鈥橲 top leaders sent three big-city union presidents to Chicago to hear evidence both on whether the election was invalid and whether union committees under Ms. Lynch had exercised their powers within the local and national unions鈥� constitutions. The panel made its decision after hearing some 11 hours of testimony two weeks earlier.
Many observers believe Ms. Stewart, a longtime teacher of children who are deaf and hard-of-hearing, is likely to step back from the education reform agenda that has brought Ms. Lynch national attention. Ms. Stewart has said she wants to refocus the union on member services and move away from 鈥渁 major shift to staff development鈥� that she contends happened under Ms. Lynch, who has a long background in teacher professional development with the CTU and the AFT.
In the campaign, Ms. Stewart criticized Ms. Lynch for negotiating a contract last fall with such givebacks as increased health-insurance costs. Many teachers disliked the contract, which led their representative body to authorize a strike, but some disliked even more Ms. Lynch鈥檚 vehement defense of it.
