The organization overseeing advanced teacher certification in the United States plans to revise the assessment process for the credential and to make it less expensive for teachers to earn.
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards announced last week that it would decrease the credential鈥檚 price tag by $600, give teachers more flexibility in completing the required assessments, and integrate new information into the certification process, including student surveys and measures of students鈥� academic progress.
Fueled in part by a $3.7 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the changes are meant to respond to a decade of new teacher-quality research and to address barriers to board certification. (The Gates Foundation also helps support coverage of business and K-12 innovation in 澳门跑狗论坛.)
About 102,000 U.S. teachers hold board certification.
Best Practices Targeted
The changes are among the first rolled out by Ronald Thorpe, who became the president and CEO of the national board in December 2011. Mr. Thorpe had vowed to boost the credential鈥檚 prestige and to elevate the role of the NBPTS as the definitive body setting standards for the teaching profession.
The board鈥檚 status to that end had appeared to wane under policy changes focusing on growth in student test scores and competitive federal grants. In one embarrassing 2012 episode, the NBPTS failed to win financing through a new federal teacher-development grant program after its own congressional earmark was eliminated.
The economic recession took its toll, too. Fewer states now subsidize the $2,500 application fee for the board鈥檚 credential or grant salary increases to teachers who complete the process.
Board officials said that the new changes will reflect the latest learning from the field, including the research from the Gates Foundation鈥檚 Measures of Effective Teaching study.
鈥淲e鈥檝e just learned a lot about best practices in teaching and want to make sure our assessments mirror that,鈥� said Andy Coons, the chief operating officer of the NBPTS.
The current assessment process consists of 10 components. As part of the overhaul, the organization will reorganize the assessments into four chunks, broadly measuring a teacher鈥檚 content knowledge; use of data to meet students鈥� needs and set goals for them; classroom pedagogy, based on a video analysis; and classroom effectiveness.
The revisions鈥攖he first to the certification process since 2001鈥攚ill take effect in 2014-15.
In what might make board certification more attractive to teachers, the organization also will reduce the application fee for teachers to $1,900鈥攁 savings largely achieved through the group鈥檚 recent move to electronic submission of candidates鈥� portfolios. And teachers will be permitted to complete the four modules in any order under a pay-as-you-go approach.
The board had been moving toward the increased flexibility already, and some board-certified teachers praised the new options.
鈥淚 work a lot with teachers in our district who go through it, and the biggest challenge is the time commitment,鈥� said Angela McCormack, a board-certified high school math teacher in Big Lake, Minn. 鈥淚t鈥檚 so much to get that done in a year.鈥�
Neither the standards underpinning board certification nor the organization鈥檚 鈥渃ore propositions鈥� for the teaching profession will change.
Multiple Measures
Committees of experts will make recommendations on how to carry out the changes, and teachers will also provide feedback in the process, Mr. Coons said.
Revisiting the question of effectiveness is likely to be the trickiest of the changes, given the heated tenor of policy debates on teacher effectiveness. It will probably mean establishing new guidelines or parameters on the evidence teachers can submit to meet that goal.
Standardized-test scores and student-perception surveys are among the measures the expert committees will address and whose appropriate place they鈥檒l gauge. The board鈥檚 movement in that direction fulfills the recommendations of an outside panel.
Mr. Coons stressed that any new guidelines will rely on multiple measures, not on a single piece of information.
鈥淚t鈥檚 an opportunity for practitioners to weigh in on them,鈥� he said, 鈥渁nd not have them decided by people who don鈥檛 know teaching or teachers.鈥�
