UPDATED
Since writing this post, I have learned the Isakson amendment has failed. Follow on Twitter for the latest updates on ESEA.
As debate over the Elementary and Secondary Education Act鈥攃urrently known as No Child Left Behind鈥�, the Council for Exceptional Children is objecting to one of the bill鈥檚 many amendments.
The one in particular they find alarming, proposed by Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, would do away with limits on how many students with disabilities could take alternate tests, which are different than those their classmates take.
鈥淭he Isakson amendment would allow any number of students with disabilities to take either an alternate assessment or a modified assessment鈥攎eaning they would be excluded from the general assessment system,鈥� the letter reads.
鈥淲hen a student with a disability takes a different assessment than a student without a disability, there is no way to compare their performance, no way to accurately measure achievement gaps, and no way to know how well they have grasped the grade-level content. Importantly, neither the data, which indicates that the students who benefit from an alternate assessment are far less than one percent, nor best practice supports placing more students into different assessments.鈥�
When No Child Left Behind was created a decade ago, one of the features many advocates for students with disabilities appreciated was that schools would be held accountable for the performance of students with disabilities on the same tests as other students. A were built in for students with the most severe cognitive disabilities, but schools were penalized for giving too many students with disabilities the alternate tests.
鈥淲e believe this amendment will set us back鈥攏ot take us forward,鈥� said Lindsay Jones of CEC.
Other groups, including the Lawyers鈥� Committee for Civil Rights, also .
The CEC letter goes on to describe what it fears could happen if the amendment becomes law:
鈥淚f large numbers or possibly all students with disabilities are given alternate or modified assessments, we will effectively鈥攁nd under the Isakson amendment鈥攍egally create a separate education system for students with disabilities.鈥�