澳门跑狗论坛

It looks as though Idaho high school students will be adding more math and science courses to their transcripts, under rigorous new standards approved by the state board of education.

Board members celebrated their unanimous adoption of the plan Nov. 16. Rod Lewis, the president, called the recommendations 鈥渁 strong foundation in preparing our students for postsecondary education or entry into the workforce.鈥�

But the proposed requirements, which must be approved by either the state House or Senate education committee aren鈥檛 nearly as strong as the original package of high school improvement measures proposed by the board鈥檚 Accelerated Learning Taskforce. (鈥淚daho Studies Minimum GPA for High School Admission,鈥� Nov. 2, 2005.)

The task force deleted much of that plan after quick and stinging public criticism of the recommendations. The change of course provides a lesson to other states on the volatility of attempts to retool high school, as many political leaders want to do.

Gone from the Idaho plan is a proposal that middle school students maintain a C average throughout the 6th, 7th, and 8th grades in order to enter high school. That idea was perhaps the most controversial piece of the package.

The task force also removed a recommended requirement that high school students take 鈥渃areer focused鈥� electives to be more prepared for college and a future profession. The concept had many parents worried that their children would have to cut back on activities such as band, debate, and drama. South Carolina, by contrast, has adopted such policies. (鈥淪outh Carolina Launches Career-Preparation Initiative,鈥� this issue.)

Also dropped was a proposal to have each middle school student create a 鈥減ostsecondary-readiness plan鈥� beginning in 6th grade instead of in 8th grade, as current policy requires.

鈥淚鈥檓 somewhat disappointed,鈥� Sue Thilo, the state board member who chaired the task force, said about having to revise the package. 鈥淎 lot of work and research and scrutiny went into that original plan. It was not haphazardly developed.鈥�

Students, she said, will now miss out on the chance to begin planning the courses they鈥檒l need in high school at an earlier point in their education.

Opponents of the readiness plans called the idea a form of academic tracking. Ms. Thilo countered that the task force just wanted students, along with their parents and school counselors, to begin a 鈥渕eaningful dialogue鈥� about students鈥� academic plans for high school.

鈥淪ometimes, students find out too late that they should have taken two years of Spanish or something else,鈥� Ms. Thilo said.

An Unwilling Public?

Across the country, states have launched projects to redesign high schools, often with leadership from national organizations such as the Washington-based Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Association of Secondary School Principals in Reston, Va.

The strategies being implemented to improve high schools include strengthening teacher quality, improving adolescent literacy, downsizing schools, and doing more to ensure students gain the skills they鈥檒l need to succeed in college or on the job.

Idaho鈥檚 experience, however, illustrates the problems policymakers can encounter when they try to raise high school standards and introduce ideas that constituents aren鈥檛 ready to accept鈥攁t least as they were proposed there.

And if there鈥檚 blame to be spread around for the failure of the Idaho plan to resonate with the public, Ms. Thilo says some of it rests on the task force itself.

鈥淲e didn鈥檛 do a good enough job of explaining,鈥� she said, adding that if given another chance, she would probably have given the career-focused electives a different name.

Those courses, she said, 鈥渨eren鈥檛 meant to dictate [a student鈥檚] life鈥攋ust give some future direction.鈥�

In spite of the task force鈥檚 series of six public hearings statewide and other attempts to get its message across, the negative reaction was insurmountable.

鈥淪ometimes, when a train leaves a station, there鈥檚 nothing you can do,鈥� Ms. Thilo said.

Laird Stone, another state board member who served on the 18-member task force, said he also liked the earlier version of the plan, but thinks maybe it was just 鈥渢oo much at once.鈥�

Even so, he said, he has also received calls and e-mails from parents and teachers wondering why those other task force recommendations on career-focused electives and the C grade-point average were dropped.

Under the revised proposal, students who are scheduled to graduate in the spring of 2012 would have to pass three years of mathematics and three years of science, which is one more year in each of those subjects than is required now.

The class of 2013 would need one more year of math, for a total of four. Originally, the task force recommended requiring four years of math by 2012. But during its Nov. 16 meeting, the board agreed to phase in the extra two years of math over two years in response to districts鈥� concerns about needing more time to develop the courses.

Students graduating in 2012 would also be required to complete a senior project under the proposed changes.

Worries About Cost

Some observers have suggested that Idaho residents might not have seen a need for the changes the task force was urging.

Unlike states with large urban populations, Idaho is a place 鈥渨here the public might not have been used to hearing that things aren鈥檛 going well in the schools. So maybe there鈥檚 some apathy there,鈥� said Matthew Gandal, the executive vice president of Achieve, a Washington-based organization founded by governors and business leaders that works to help states raise academic standards and prepare students for postsecondary education.

He added that perhaps the task force didn鈥檛 do enough to lay the groundwork for the proposed changes and show people the need for them.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a wake-up call for a lot of people, but it was almost like starting a conversation from scratch,鈥� he said of the Idaho effort.

Ms. Thilo agreed that this might have been part of the problem, even though facts were presented to the public showing that the state鈥檚 college-attendance and -completion rates are below the national average and the state鈥檚 economic base demands a more skilled workforce.

鈥淣obody likes to hear that they鈥檙e not doing a good enough job,鈥� she said.

Some people also felt the board鈥檚 timing for the proposal was just wrong.

鈥淚t came at an interesting time here in Idaho,鈥� said Sherri Wood, the president of the Idaho Education Association, the state affiliate of the National Education Association. She added that course electives have been cut in the state recently and that teachers have not had an increase in their base salary in five years.

鈥淗ere we are asking for reform,鈥� Ms. Wood said, 鈥渨hen we can鈥檛 afford to pay for what we have now.鈥�

Even with the scaling back of the plan, she said, concerns remain about how the state would pay for additional math and science courses and provide remedial help to students who didn鈥檛 pass them.

The state board has prepared some preliminary cost figures that it will present to the legislature for such needs as teacher training, teacher salaries, and senior projects that would include a research paper and an oral presentation. For fiscal 2007, the board estimates, the additional costs would come to about $1.4 million, with the amount increasing annually until it reached $17.1 million in fiscal 2013.

Criticism of the earlier redesign plan also came from some Idaho school administrators, who said they were left out of the process.

But Ms. Thilo rejects the suggestion that the task force tried to be exclusive.

鈥淚 think a lot of times when folks don鈥檛 like something, there鈥檚 a natural reaction to say, 鈥業 wasn鈥檛 a part of it,鈥� 鈥� she said. She added that she thought the task force included a wide range of 鈥渆ducation stakeholders.鈥�

Ms. Thilo also said that although some earlier parts of the plan had to be dropped to move forward, she鈥檚 not going to forget about them.

鈥淚鈥檓 not giving up the notion that we still need to invigorate our middle school curriculum,鈥� she said about the controversial idea of the C-average requirement. 鈥淚f that isn鈥檛 the plan, then what is the plan?鈥�