澳门跑狗论坛

Law & Courts

Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Spare Huge E-Rate Funding Source

By Mark Walsh 鈥 October 01, 2024 3 min read
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen under stormy skies in Washington, June 20, 2019. In the coming days, the Supreme Court will confront a perfect storm mostly of its own making, a trio of decisions stemming directly from the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The Biden administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule a lower court and reinstate the funding mechanism for the Universal Service Fund, which distributes some $2 billion annually under the E-rate program for connecting schools and libraries to the internet.

A federal appeals court in July ruled that the USF鈥檚 funding mechanism was unconstitutional. It said that Congress鈥 delegation of its taxing power to the Federal Communications Commission, and the FCC鈥檚 鈥渟ubdelegation鈥 of that power to the Universal Service Administrative Company, the private, nonprofit corporation that manages the USF and recommends the contribution amounts charged to telecommunications carriers, violated separation-of-powers principles under Article I of the U.S. Constitution.

The telecom providers recoup their contributions to the fund by passing along such costs to their customers, which critics of the funding mechanism say makes it a tax.

鈥淎merican telecommunications consumers are subject to a multi-billion-dollar tax nobody voted for,鈥 the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, said in . 鈥淭he size of that tax is de facto determined by a trade group staffed by industry insiders with no semblance of accountability to the public. And the trade group in turn relies on projections made by its private, for-profit constituent companies, all of which stand to profit from every single tax increase.鈥

The decision has sparked alarm among school groups over the future of the E-rate program, which as part of the USF was established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and has provided billions of dollars for telephone service and internet connections for schools.

See also

Photograph of a young girl reading, wearing headphones and working at her desk at home with laptop near by.
iStock/Getty Images Plus

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, in her in Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers鈥 Research said the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision 鈥渢hreatens to nullify the universal service programs鈥攖o the detriment of the millions of Americans whom those programs serve.鈥

鈥淚f the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision is allowed to take effect, carriers in that circuit (and perhaps elsewhere) are likely to argue that they no longer have a legal obligation to make universal service contributions because the FCC and the administrator lack the power to collect such payments,鈥 Prelogar said. 鈥淪uch a development would devastate the FCC鈥檚 ability to ensure sufficient funding for universal service subsidies going forward.鈥

The solicitor general and the FCC argue that the commission retains oversight and control over USAC, noting that the nonprofit organization makes financial projections about the contributions telecom providers must make, but that the FCC approves the amounts. Prelogar said USAC does not exercise any independent regulatory authority.

Two other federal appeals courts have upheld the funding mechanism for the Universal Service Fund, and the Supreme Court last spring declined to review those decisions.

But the decision by the 5th Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, creates a circuit conflict over the question and likely increases the chances the high court would take up the issue.

The challenger of the funding mechanism in all three cases is , a Vienna, Va.-based watchdog group that contends the USF funding mechanism is an unprecedented and illegal delegation of federal taxing power to an 鈥渦nelected agency bureaucracy.鈥

That mechanism now raises some $10 billion per year overall for the fund, which in addition to schools and libraries also aids low-income families, broadband in remote areas, and rural healthcare facilities.

The group has until Oct. 30 to file a response to the Biden administration鈥檚 petition for review. After the 5th Circuit decision in July, Consumers鈥 Research to reopen its appeals of the two lower-court decisions that upheld the funding mechanism.

Prelogar said in her own filing that it would make more sense for the Supreme Court to simply grant review of the 5th Circuit decision.

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum Big AI Questions for Schools. How They Should Respond鈥
Join this free virtual event to unpack some of the big questions around the use of AI in K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 澳门跑狗论坛's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM鈥檚 Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Won't Take Up Case on District's Gender Transition Policy
The U.S. Supreme Court declined an appeal from a parents' group contending that a district's policy on gender support plans excludes them.
4 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, June 30, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to hear a case about a school district鈥檚 policy to support students undergoing gender transitions.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts High Court Won't Review School Admissions Policy That Sought to Boost Diversity
The U.S. Supreme Court refused a case about whether race was unconstitutionally considered in admissions to Boston's selective schools.
5 min read
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is pictured, Oct. 7, 2024, in Washington. The court on Monday declined to take up a case about the Boston district鈥檚 facially race-neutral admissions policy for selective magnet high schools.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Case on Medical Care for Trans Youth Could Impact School Sports
The justices weigh a Tennessee law that bars certain medical treatments for transgender minors, with school issues bubbling around the case.
8 min read
Transgenders rights supporters rally outside of the Supreme Court, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024, in Washington.
Transgender rights supporters rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 4 as the court weighed a Tennessee law that restricts certain medical treatments for transgender minors.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts How a Supreme Court Case on Vaping Stands to Impact Schools
The U.S. Supreme Court heard an important case about federal regulation of flavored e-cigarettes, which remain a concern for schools.
6 min read
A high school principal displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in such places as restrooms or hallways at a school in Massachusetts on April 10, 2018.
A high school principal in Massachusetts displays vaping devices that were confiscated from students in restrooms or hallways on April 10, 2018.
Steven Senne/AP