President-elect Donald Trump will come into the White House in January with Republicans in control of both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate, along with a friendly Supreme Court鈥攇reasing the skids for him to begin implementing education priorities he and allies laid out in the runup to last month鈥檚 election.
鈥淲e鈥檙e now beginning to see the scaffolding, the framework鈥� for much of that to take place, said Kenneth Wong, professor of education policy at Brown University.
Wong sees the influence of President Ronald Reagan鈥檚 legacy on Trump as he begins his second term: calls for deregulation and sending decisionmaking authority to the states. Trump could also elevate Republican-led states as partners to advance his aims.
Education policy researchers believe that Trump, in his second term, will double down on initiatives he laid out in his first, including deep cuts to the Department of Education鈥檚 bottom line, a focus on private school choice, and rolling back protections for transgender students.
Within the first 12 months of Trump鈥檚 return to the White House, Wong anticipates the new education secretary鈥�Trump has tapped Linda McMahon鈥攚ill be tasked with delivering on some of these pledges.
But for further changes to education, Congress will need to go along, and Republicans who support Trump鈥檚 initiatives will still have to answer to their constituencies, who may benefit from federal education programs and seek to protect funding, Wong said.
鈥淚 think there is a balancing act on the part of every single Republican member of Congress,鈥� he said.
Here are some key policy changes that the Trump administration may tackle early in his second administration.
Dismantling the Department of Education鈥攐r limiting it
On the campaign trail, Trump embraced the perennial cause of calling for the abolition of the U.S. Department of Education. Many Republicans have sought to end the agency ever since it was founded in 1979. There鈥檚 renewed momentum for it following Trump鈥檚 win, with a bill already filed to kill the department.
Reagan came closest. But the education secretary he charged with shutting down the agency led a commission that ultimately contributed to a consensus that federal leadership on education was needed, through its show-stopping report 鈥淎 Nation at Risk.鈥� No longer would Reagan dissolve the department; he would change the paradigm, Wong said. Prior to his administration, the department focused on providing resources; Reagan introduced the concept of accountability and expansive data collection.
Instead of dismantling the Education Department, Reagan signed the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act, which reduced federal regulations for Title I鈥攖he grant program that provides extra money for schools that enroll large numbers of students from low-income households鈥攁s part of a larger philosophy of assigning states more control over education while maintaining a federal role in schools.
Researchers have said that dissolving the department will be a difficult undertaking. But a Trump administration could do as Reagan did: downsize the role of the department without getting rid of it entirely.
鈥淚 think this particular Congress is going to be very supportive鈥� of consolidating programming, Wong said.
Expanding private school choice nationwide
Trump prioritized an expansion of school choice in his first term, but he didn鈥檛 notch many significant policy victories to make it happen at the federal level. However, such an expansion has taken off among Republican-led states since Trump left office. Today, 28 states and Washington, D.C., have at least one private school choice program that allows parents to use public funds to pay for private school tuition, according to an 澳门跑狗论坛 analysis.
Expanding private school choice is likely to remain a top education policy priority for Trump as he takes office in January. Trump tapped World Wrestling Entertainment founder and chair of conservative public policy think tank America First Policy Linda McMahon to 鈥渆xpand 鈥楥hoice鈥� to every State in America, and empower parents to make the best Education decisions for their families,鈥� as he said in a statement announcing her selection.
There is already momentum in Congress, with bills introduced in the House and Senate. In a new session, with Republicans controlling both chambers, similar measures could see more energy. In the bill to eliminate the Education Department, states would also be able to use federal funds for private schools.
But Republicans representing rural areas, where there are limited choices beyond the public system, have opposed expansive choice programs in the past and derailed some state school choice programs. Those legislators will be careful not to alienate their constituencies, researchers have said.
鈥淚n order to promote choice, this partnership of very active federal and state collaboration is necessary in order for choice to go forward,鈥� Wong said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think the federal government can do as much, but I do feel that state legislation and state funding can actually propel this choice platform of the Trump administration.鈥�
Rolling back Title IX protections for transgender students
Trump has pledged that on 鈥淒ay 1,鈥� he will roll back the Biden administration鈥檚 more extensive Title IX regulation, which interpreted the landmark sex discrimination law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in federally funded schools.
Already, the Biden rule is on hold in 26 states, as well as a number of individual schools elsewhere, as a result of legal challenges that are still making their way through courts.
Legal experts have said that Trump can鈥檛 undo the Biden administration鈥檚 regulations immediately through an executive order, but it is something he can direct the education secretary to do through the federal government鈥檚 formal rulemaking process. It鈥檚 not something that requires an act of Congress.
Targeting DEI efforts and 鈥渦npatriotic鈥� education
Taking a lesson from Reagan鈥攁nd emulating an initiative from his first term鈥擶ong says that Trump could create a commission to elevate his education priorities, with a particular focus on 鈥減atriotic鈥� education and schools鈥� diversity, equity, and inclusion work.
Trump鈥檚 1776 Commission in his first term sought to generate momentum around teaching 鈥減atriotic鈥� U.S. history. President Joe Biden ended it immediately upon taking office, but it鈥檚 credited with breathing life into a wave of state laws restricting how teachers can discuss race, racism, and gender identity in classrooms.
鈥淚 think that鈥檚 the cluster of guiding principles that might permeate through some kind of a commission that would justify the elimination, or significantly reducing the size and the role, of the U.S. federal government in K-12,鈥� Wong said.
The federal government does not control curriculum, but a recent House education subcommittee hearing on civics education telegraphed Republican priorities for continuing to energize states to take action on banning critical race theory in schools.
At the federal level, Trump鈥檚 administration could work toward these priorities through the Education Department鈥檚 office for civil rights, which enforces federal laws barring discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, and disability status.
Wong said it鈥檚 possible the Trump administration will use OCR to crack down on school DEI efforts.
Challenging undocumented students鈥� right to a free education
Trump has called for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, echoing efforts from his first term. Though a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling has long protected undocumented students鈥� right to a free public education, there have been calls for the decision to be overturned, with some Republicans blaming migrant students for taking resources away from other students.
The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that has developed a detailed policy agenda with the help of Trump allies and former Trump administration officials, recently issued a brief calling on states to require that public schools charge unaccompanied migrant children and children of undocumented immigrant parents tuition, in an attempt to bring the issue before the Supreme Court again.
Rhetoric surrounding mass deportations has already seeped into schools, and there鈥檚 concern from some that Trump may try to reverse a policy that prevents immigration raids at 鈥渟ensitive locations,鈥� allowing immigration officers to arrest parents dropping children off at school.
鈥淭rump has very high priority in terms of addressing this immigration issue. I think that has several dimensions. One is that he is going to elevate the role of the state to collaborate as partners鈥攕o the state and the federal government are going to partner to address some of these major challenges such as immigration,鈥� Wong said. 鈥淚n education, my sense is he鈥檚 going to use that even more rigorously.鈥�
