澳门跑狗论坛

The National Association of Secondary School Principals has outlined a detailed, and expensive, agenda for ways the federal government can help improve high schools鈥攆rom dramatically boosting federal aid for adolescent literacy to establishing a big, flexible spending pot to help low-performing high school students.

is available online from the .

While some of the agenda has echoes, if much costlier ones, of President Bush鈥檚 plans for high schools, notably absent is any support for his call to mandate more testing in the high school grades.

In all, the plan issued by the Reston, Va.-based NASSP would involve about $5 billion annually in new federal spending for high schools. The group notes that high schools currently receive less federal aid than middle schools and far less than elementary ones.

But the hefty price tag on the organization鈥檚 proposal is likely to be a tough sell in Washington鈥檚 current fiscal climate, with high budget deficits and added demands for military and homeland-security spending putting the squeeze on domestic programs. The entire Department of Education discretionary budget increased by less than $1 billion for fiscal 2005, and President Bush, while calling for new spending for high schools, has requested a slight dip in the department鈥檚 overall budget for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

Gerald N. Tirozzi, the executive director of the NASSP, said in an interview last week that the impetus for his group鈥檚 legislative plan was to respond to the president鈥檚 high school agenda, especially its emphasis on expanding federal testing requirements at the secondary level.

鈥淚t starts really with a significant concern we have that the administration 鈥� is making some very strong statements to push forward with No Child Left Behind into the high schools,鈥� said Mr. Tirozzi, who was an assistant secretary of education under President Clinton.

鈥淚 personally think that defies logic,鈥� he said of the president鈥檚 testing proposal. 鈥淲e have to stop this business of taking [students鈥橾 temperature over and over again to find that they鈥檙e ill. 鈥� We never provide the intervention strategy.鈥�

鈥楲ong Overdue鈥�

The NASSP proposal, which the group discussed in special briefings for Congress on Feb. 15, seeks to channel far more federal aid into high schools than is currently provided. 鈥淭o date, federal resources in support of school improvement have mainly been targeted at the elementary level and to some extent the middle level,鈥� says the NASSP plan. 鈥淭he next and long-overdue stage in the evolution of school reform must be the improvement of the nation鈥檚 high schools.鈥�

The group notes that high schools receive only about 5 percent of federal aid under the Title I program for disadvantaged students, the centerpiece of the No Child Left Behind Act, even though they enroll about 28 percent of K-12 students nationwide.

President Bush in his budget request for fiscal 2006 outlined a series of high school plans. He wants to spend $250 million to help states meet his proposal to mandate two more years of high school testing. Under the No Child Left Behind Act, states currently must test students each year in grades 3-8 in mathematics and reading, and once in high school in both those subjects. (鈥淏ush鈥檚 High School Agenda Faces Obstacles,鈥� Feb. 9, 2005.)

Mr. Bush also wants to set up a $1.2 billion High School Intervention program that would offer states and districts considerable flexibility in devising means to help low-performing students. And he has called for more spending on other items, such as providing $52 million for making Advanced Placement courses more available to disadvantaged high schoolers, and dramatically increasing the Striving Readers program鈥攁n intervention for struggling middle and high school students鈥攖o $200 million.

Not to be outdone, the NASSP would give the Striving Readers program a much more robust boost, bringing its funding to $1 billion, an amount more on par with federal aid for elementary school reading. Congress provided $25 million for Striving Readers this year.

鈥淪triving Readers comes out to like $4.50 per kid,鈥� Mr. Tirozzi said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 disgraceful.鈥�

The costliest recommendation in the NASSP proposal is the creation of a separate funding stream of $3.6 billion to address the academic needs of low-performing high school students.

That money would help states, districts, and high schools meet the accountability and teacher-quality demands of the No Child Left Behind law, the group says. It arrived at the $3.6 billion figure by calculating how much high schoolers would currently receive if Title I aid were 鈥渁ccurately distributed on the basis of student populations and student need.鈥�

Mr. Tirozzi argues that a big problem with President Bush鈥檚 High School Intervention fund is that the money would come from abolishing the $1.3 billion now spent for federal vocational education programs.

鈥淭he answer is not to borrow from Peter to pay Paul,鈥� he said.

Wrong Venue?

Krista Kafer, a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank, said the NASSP package contains some sound ideas. But she argued that Capitol Hill was the wrong place to pursue them.

鈥淭here鈥檚 no reason why these should be necessarily federally funded,鈥� Ms. Kafer said. 鈥淓very single one of these recommendations could be achieved at the local, state, or private level.鈥�

She also doubted, given the current fiscal realities in Washington, that lawmakers are likely to heed the pricey suggestions.

鈥淎re we ever surprised when special interest groups call for more money?鈥� she said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 kind of what they do. 鈥� The money is just not there.鈥�