Robb Elementary had been a symbol of resilience and progress for residents. Its meaning changed in one horrific day.
Robb Elementary in Uvalde, Texas, will be demolished.
The school of nearly 600 mostly Hispanic students in 2nd through 4th grades is now known internationally as the site of one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history.
But long before that, the school was a symbol of civic pride for Mexican American families. Before the 21 funerals, the headlines, investigations, marches, tears, and never-ending grief鈥攊t represented a legacy of activism for Mexican Americans鈥� access to quality education.
It鈥檚 a legacy some hope will carry on even as Robb鈥檚 story is now an inextricable part of a growing, national, tragic tale of school sites where multiple children have been killed in mass shootings.
The story of Robb Elementary, like that of its parent school district in this South Texas town, is a complicated narrative of a community鈥檚 ongoing fight for progress toward equal rights. It stretches from the schooling era of the Jim Crow South to recent, popular investments in dual-language education.
Now, with the details on the future of Robb Elementary still in flux, former students and activists from generations past wonder how to move forward after a tremendous loss, asking themselves wrenching questions with no clear answers.
What can we learn from Uvalde about what it means to be safe in school鈥損hysically, emotionally, culturally? What does it mean when a place that embodied a community鈥檚 hopes for their children鈥檚 education is now a mausoleum to them?
How do you preserve the memory of a place that is a source of both historic pride and deep pain?
A site of segregation
Robb Elementary鈥檚 story starts with segregation.
In the early part of the 20th century, some Mexicans and Mexican Americans in the South Texas region attended well-resourced community schools known as escuelitas. But the majority of children of Mexican descent in the area attended public county-run schools, later known as schools in independent school districts, that operated under Jim Crow rules, said Francisco Guajardo, chief executive officer of the Museum of South Texas History in Edinburg.
Uvalde鈥檚 Robb Elementary was colloquially called a Mexican school. Built on the west side of town where more Mexican and Mexican American families resided, the differences between it and other district schools were palpable even at first glance.
鈥淵ou saw that Dalton [Elementary], which was on the Anglo (or white) side of town, was manicured,鈥� said Olga Rodriquez, 77, whose family immigrated to the Uvalde area when she was 9. 鈥淚t had landscaping, trees, it was neat, it was pretty, where Robb had no trees.
鈥淭here was no maintenance. The parents always were complaining about how the bathrooms were always broken and just what is typical of a segregated school,鈥� Rodriquez continued.
Things weren鈥檛 much better from the students鈥� perspective.
Linda Morales, 67, a student at Robb in her youth, recalled having a teacher who would slap students鈥� calves with a 36-inch ruler if they were caught speaking Spanish.
鈥淢ost of the teachers when I was in school were Anglo teachers. There were very few Mexican American teachers鈥攙ery few,鈥� she said.
The discrimination didn鈥檛 stop at the elementary school level.
Abelardo Castillo, 76, who grew up about two blocks away from Robb Elementary, described a white high school counselor who would advise Mexican Americans not to pursue a college education.
鈥淗er thing was, 鈥榊ou Mexicans are very good with your hands so why don鈥檛 you follow your uncle. He鈥檚 a mechanic鈥�,鈥� Castillo said.
One Mexican American educator stood out in the 1960s for his work in translating school information for parents in Spanish and advocating for better conditions for students: Josue 鈥淕eorge鈥� Garza of Robb Elementary.
Effectively an assistant principal in all but title, Garza was beloved within the community. When his principal did not renew his teaching contract, reportedly disapproving of his advocacy work, it set ablaze years of pent-up frustration among Mexican American families.
Inspired by similar efforts across the country and within neighboring Texas cities, hundreds of students walked out of class on April 14, 1970 in a walkout that lasted about six weeks. As many as 600 students participated, fueled by support from local activists, including Rodriquez and Castillo.
The activists demanded that Garza be reinstated, but also set forth an expansive vision for their education. They demanded more Hispanic educators, more Mexican American history classes, and better maintenance of schools鈥攁ll to provide quality education for Mexican American students.
Rodriquez, who worked on public messaging for the walkout as a secretary for the local parent group, the Mexican American Parents Association, described Texas Department of Public Safety helicopters hovering over the scene and at least one Texas Ranger screaming at a 6-year-old walkout participant. She remembers anger from white families upset at Mexican and Mexican American families for demanding change, she said.
Walkout leaders developed communication strategies, assigning point people who would gather and disseminate news from the ongoing national Chicano Movement to shape their organizing, Castillo said. (That movement, inspired by and part of the broader civil rights movement of the 1960s, was the Mexican and Mexican American community鈥檚 fight for justice and inclusion.)
Later that summer, local parent activist Genoveva Morales filed a lawsuit against the district seeking the desegregation of local schools.
But participation in the walkout wasn鈥檛 unanimous, and sparked tension within the local Mexican and Mexican American population. Some students questioned whether it was the right move鈥攁fter all, they were still going to school and graduating.
Morales, the former Robb student, didn鈥檛 participate in the walkout because her father disapproved of it. He thought the walkout was prompted by outsiders鈥攏ot something originating locally, and couldn鈥檛 see the bigger picture of why the walkout was needed.
鈥淭hose of us that didn鈥檛 walk out, we felt like we weren鈥檛 there for the cause, you know, la causa. We really didn鈥檛 understand la causa,鈥� Morales said. 鈥淵es, Robb was a poor school. It wasn鈥檛 always kept up. But we didn鈥檛 see that as children.
鈥淚 can鈥檛 say it tore our town apart,鈥� she continued. 鈥淏ut I think there was some anger from those who did walk out against the ones that didn鈥檛 walk out.鈥�
And those who did participate bore the brunt of consequences. Students involved had to repeat a year of school or lost their eligibility to graduate that year. Adults who protested put their jobs on the line. Some activists including Rodriquez even dealt with FBI investigators knocking on their doors.
But for Rodriquez and others, all the risk was worth it.
鈥淲hat drove us? It was the love of our children,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e didn鈥檛 want them to continue in menial labor and a lack of opportunities to get higher education.
鈥淪chools are everything. If our kids do not have a good education, what鈥檚 their future going to be like?鈥� she said. 鈥淎nd I know that almost every parent in Uvalde can say that they will give their last breath to give their kids the best education they can.鈥�
A site of growth and progress
The quality education Mexican and Mexican American parents and students fought for in the 1970s finally did begin to emerge in Robb Elementary and the other local schools鈥攁lbeit over an extended timeline, say former educators and parents. And that progress is a source of considerable pride.
Take the number of Hispanic educators in the district. In the 1970s, just a handful of Hispanic teachers worked in the district, mainly because few speakers of Spanish were licensed. As of the 2020-21 school year, Hispanic teachers accounted for about 64 percent of the district鈥檚 teacher workforce, according to state data.
Maria Casta帽on Hernandez, 58, saw the shift in representation even within the counseling department of Uvalde High School.
A former Robb Elementary student and a product of Uvalde schools, including the local junior college, Casta帽on Hernandez worked as a teacher for 15 years before becoming a high school counselor in 2003. At that time there were two white counselors and two Hispanic counselors including herself.
By the time she retired in 2018, the entire counseling team was Hispanic, and so was the school鈥檚 principal.
She attributes that growth in representation to both the 1970 lawsuit, which ultimately required the district to be more conscious in its staff hires to match the diversity of its student body, and the opening of the Uvalde campus of the Sul Ross State University in partnership with the local Southwest Texas Junior College. It offered education programs that could essentially grow a local pipeline of educators.
Thanks to the lawsuit, which yielded a consent agreement with the district that was modified several times, Casta帽on Hernandez recalls how weaker schools in the district were monitored. Every year, the district submitted paperwork tracking things such as the rate at which Hispanic students were enrolled in Advanced Placement courses, and how many were involved in athletics, cheerleading, and clubs.
And over time, she witnessed growth in access to academic and extracurricular opportunities as both an educator and a mother. Her eldest took four years of mariachi in high school in the early 2000s, something Casta帽on Hernandez could only dream of when she was a student at the same school.
Her elementary alma mater, Robb Elementary, even got a whole building addition that looked fresh and modern鈥攁 far cry from the days when the school was poorly maintained.
In more recent years, the Uvalde district has boasted a growing participation rate in its. Demand for a , which started around 2014, rapidly surged so the district opened a dual-language academy for the 2021-22 school year.
Over the years, though, the Hispanic student population has grown from roughly 50 percent of the district in the 1970s to close to 91 percent in the 2020-21 school year. That change has left some residents, such as Rodriquez, wondering if the progress in offering quality education to Mexican American students reflects the reality that Hispanic students are now a clear majority more than it does a good faith effort to do right by this community.
Amid the progress, some gaps have remained. Toward the end of her career, Casta帽on Hernandez saw a steady rate of dropouts among Hispanic students in particular, and a new emphasis on serving the mental health needs of students alongside their academic needs.
鈥淲e had a deep concern on the number of students that suffered from anxiety, which caused absenteeism, and that would turn into failing classes,鈥� she said.
And even as the academic opportunities in Uvalde school grew for Hispanic students, the political power of the town鈥檚 Hispanic population didn鈥檛 see the same level of steady progress.
Residents point to success stories from the local schools, such as students accepted to Ivy league schools and one who won a MacArthur Fellowship. But, they noted, many of these individuals ended up moving out for bigger opportunities across the country and state. The avenues for career growth in town have remained limited, former residents said.
鈥淚t鈥檚 been a community of struggle,鈥� Morales said, who now lives in Houston working for a labor union. 鈥淲e never had the good jobs, we were always doing the work down there. The big jobs were probably working at H-E-B [a major Texas grocery store chain] as a cashier. 鈥�
It begs the question of how schools can get such talent to stay and invest in improving the lives of Uvalde鈥檚 Hispanic community.
鈥淲e have to inspire young people to get involved in their communities,鈥� Rodriquez said.
For now, the generations that paved the way for success take pride in how far things have come. A testament to that work occurred in 2017, when the desegregation lawsuit was finally dismissed, 47 years after the initial filing.
Castillo, who left Uvalde for some time but has since returned to his hometown, points to the drastic change in the aspirations of Robb Elementary鈥檚 latest student cohort.
Gone are the days of Hispanic students regularly being told they had few options after high school. Students at Robb Elementary like 10-year-old Alithia Ramirez wanted to go to art school in Paris. And classmate Maite Rodriguez had set her sights on Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi and a career as a marine biologist.
A site of horror
Now a new reality has set in.
Alithia and Maite鈥檚 dreams, along with those of 17 of their classmates and two teachers, were cut short on May 24 by an 18-year-old gunman. And once again, Uvalde parents鈥攁nd especially those whose children attended Robb Elementary鈥攆ind themselves grappling with the question of what they must do to protect their children鈥檚 futures.
This time they must do so in the most literal sense of the word, confronting the reality of unlocked classroom doors, police failures, and gun policy.
As families and the press continue to piece together exactly what occurred that day in the halls of Robb Elementary, those from generations past share in the pain鈥攁nd shed light on what may come of the tragedy.
鈥淚f anything good comes out of it鈥攁nd I know people are hurting鈥攖here鈥檒l be some activists that come out of this that will demand change, that鈥檒l run for office and speak up,鈥� Morales said.
Past and current residents are calling for a shift in conversations around school safety, more transparency from law enforcement, and tangible action on gun control laws, among other things.
鈥淚t鈥檚 so overwhelming that we have to fight to make things better,鈥� Rodriquez said.
The conversations are likely to mimic some of the questions asked back in 1970, such as what approach will effectively bring about change.
Activist parent groups have formed, and there have been several debates at city council and school board meetings over the fate of Robb Elementary鈥檚 principal and that of the officers present the day of the shooting.
But Uvalde and Robb Elementary are now also part of a much larger story about the future of school safety policy.
鈥淭his is not 1970 anymore, where the school walkout really was only consequential to this one community,鈥� said Guajardo with the Museum of South Texas History. 鈥淲hat happened in 2022, that mass shooting is consequential for Uvalde, and it鈥檚 consequential for the country.鈥�
All eyes are on this town now as it publicly grapples with one of its darkest, profoundly painful moments.
鈥淲e have come a long way,鈥� Rodriquez said. 鈥淎nd Uvalde will be a better community because we must do it in memory of these victims.鈥�
Residents agree Robb Elementary鈥檚 building cannot stand as is. They cannot inflict more trauma on students by making them return to the scene of the attack, they said.
A newly created foundation will collect funds to build a new elementary school for the district. Students will be able to attend virtual classes this fall if returning in person proves too difficult, according to the district.
But whether there will be a memorial erected in Robb鈥檚 current site鈥攐r a museum built capturing both the tragedy and the history that came before it鈥攊s still unclear.
Amid the questions and cries, residents past and present hope that time will help heal these profound wounds.
