ܹ̳

School & District Management

‘Dropout Factories’ Identified In Hopkins Study

By Debra Viadero — July 14, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

A report has flagged 2,000 high schools across the country as potential “dropout factories” because 40 percent or more of their freshmen fail to make it to 12th grade on time.

Schools with potentially high dropout rates span the nation, according to the study, which was published last month by researchers from the Center for Social Organization of Schools at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. But most of the schools are in 50 urban areas and 15 Southern and Southwestern states.

In South Carolina, for instance, such schools make up 50 percent of all high schools, while in Michigan, almost all of the “dropout factories” are concentrated in a few cities.

Regardless of where they are located, those schools are attended overwhelmingly by African-American and Latino students, the report says. The researchers found that schools where a majority of students were members of minority groups were five times as likely as mostly white schools to be places where students’ chances of reaching 12th grade on time were 50-50 or worse.

is available from the . (Requires .)

The new study is important, experts said, because it shows the extent of the dropout problem nationwide. Currently, states, school districts, and the federal government all vary in how they count dropouts, leaving a statistical hole in public knowledge on the problem’s scope.

“This shows there are surprisingly large numbers of schools that have potentially severe dropout problems,” said Christopher B. Swanson, a researcher at the Washington-based Urban Institute who has also studied dropouts. Coupled with other recent studies on the issue, he said, the Johns Hopkins report suggests that “graduation rates are probably a lot lower than we think.”

Weak ‘Promoting Power’

For their study, the Johns Hopkins researchers collected federal statistics on enrollment, dating back to 1993, for every public high school and vocational high school in the country with 300 or more students. They compared 9th and 10th grade enrollments in those schools with 12th grade enrollments three and four years later. The 2,000 schools they identified as having the weakest “promoting power” were those where only 60 percent or less of the students who started out made it to 12th grade on time.

Though commonly used at district and state levels, this research technique should be used with caution in labeling individual problem schools, said Jay P. Greene, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research in New York City.

“Some of these schools may not be the worst graduators, but they may have particularly high numbers of transfer students,” he said.

But the Hopkins researchers note that their study is meant to be an indicator of trouble, rather than a direct measure.

“If half your freshmen, or 60 percent or even 70 percent, make it to 12th grade, we’re flagging you as a school with a very high likelihood of having a high dropout rate,” said Robert Balfanz, who wrote the report with Nettie Legters.

When policymakers know where problem schools are, he pointed out, they can target their efforts at specific schools to increase graduation rates instead of relying on “blanket reforms” for all schools.

The 15 states the researchers identified with the “worst promoting power” are: Arizona, California, Georgia, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Texas. Together, they have 80 percent of the high schools likely to produce the highest numbers of dropouts, the study found.

Sixty percent of the high schools with the worst problems were found in large and medium-size cities.

However, in the South, unlike other parts of the country, the “dropout factories” tended to be in rural areas and to enroll more white students. Florida was the only state identified where most of the schools with potentially severe dropout problems had white-majority enrollments.

The researchers also found that the number of schools with weak promoting power has increased by 75 percent since 1993, while the overall number of high schools over the same period grew by only 8 percent.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the July 14, 2004 edition of ܹ̳ as ‘Dropout Factories’ Identified In Hopkins Study

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum Big AI Questions for Schools. How They Should Respond 
Join this free virtual event to unpack some of the big questions around the use of AI in K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of ܹ̳'s editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of ܹ̳'s editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM’s Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

School & District Management Principals Polled: Where School Leaders Stand on 10 Big Issues
A look at how principals responded to questions on Halloween costumes, snow days, teacher morale, and more.
4 min read
Illustration of speech/thought bubbles.
DigitalVision Vectors
School & District Management Opinion You’re the Principal, and Your Teachers Hate a New District Policy. What Now?
This school leader committed to being a bridge between his district and school staff this year. Here’s what he learned.
Ian Knox
4 min read
A district liaison bridging the gap between 2 sides.
Vanessa Solis/ܹ̳ via Canva
School & District Management The 4 District Leaders Who Could Be the Next Superintendent of the Year
Four district leaders are finalists for the national honor. They've emphasized CTE, student safety, financial sustainability, and more.
4 min read
Clockwise from upper left: Sharon Desmoulin-Kherat, superintendent of the Peoria Public School District 150; Walter Gonsoulin, superintendent of Jefferson County Schools; Debbie Jones, superintendent of the Bentonville School District; David Moore, superintendent of the School District of Indian River County.
Clockwise from upper left: Sharon Desmoulin-Kherat, superintendent of the Peoria school district in Illinois; Walter Gonsoulin, superintendent of Jefferson County schools in Alabama; Debbie Jones, superintendent of the Bentonville, Ark., school district; and David Moore, superintendent in Indian River County, Fla. The four have been named finalists for national Superintendent of the Year. AASA will announce the winner in March 2025.
Courtesy of AASA, the School Superintendent's Association
School & District Management 3 Tips for Districts to Maximize FEMA Funding After a Natural Disaster
District leaders who have been through natural disasters stress the need for thorough documentation, even if it seems excessive.
5 min read
Close up of FEMA paperwork
iStock/Getty