°ÄÃÅÅܹ·ÂÛ̳

Today’s Guest post is written by international Formative Assessment expert . Clarke is located in London, England.

My passion is the practical application of the principles of formative assessment - working with action research teams across the UK and the US to experiment with ways in which we can maximize student achievement. Formative assessment, through its unfortunate mislabeling, has sometimes been misunderstood to be continuous summative action or something a teacher does to students to get information.

Formative assessment is, in fact, a number of elements which enable rather than measure progress, and result in students becoming assessment literate. These are:

• A learning culture of a (Carol Dweck) and meta cognition or (Guy Claxton)
• Involving students in planning units of work
• Effective talk and discussion
• Effective questioning
• Knowing lesson learning targets (confusingly called lesson learning objectives in the UK) and co-constructing success criteria
• Knowing what excellence looks like
• Effective ongoing self/peer and teacher feedback

Let’s take one of these - the use of fantastic questions at beginnings of lessons, engaging students instantly in the subject matter and establishing prior knowledge.

Many teachers start lessons with recall questions and a culture of ‘hands up’, during which many students opt out. Once talk partners are established (my research shows that randomly paired talk partners which change weekly are most effective), the ‘hands up’ can go, because every question to the class is followed by a very brief discussion with the talk partner. Named popsicle sticks out of a can are used to determine which pair then answer, thus providing maximum focus. Unlike the ‘hands up’ scenario, every student has to talk and think.

Recall questions are often our default, so one aspect of my work has been finding brilliant question templates which can be used for any subject or age group. These can effectively convert recall questions into highly worthwhile questions which will deepen and further student understanding rather than simply measuring it, providing the perfect lesson start.

So far, I have gathered at least 10 templates, the most popular of which are:

• A range of answers
• A statement
• Right and wrong
• What went wrong?
• Starting from the end
• Odd one out
• Opposing standpoint
• Order these
• Always, sometimes, never true?
• Real life question

Remember that all of these strategies have most impact when talk partners are asked to discuss their thinking first, rather than as whole class. Let’s take a look at some of them...

A range of ‘answers’

Notice the juxtaposition of ‘answers’ which are right, wrong and ‘maybe’. The more ambiguous planned ‘answers’ promote the most fruitful discussion between talk partners. For young children pictures are used.

The statement

The question here is whether the students agree or disagree with the statement, after short paired talk, giving their reasons. This technique can be used across all subjects. This table shows a traditional recall question converted into a richer statement for discussion:

One teacher in a Scottish school showed her class a picture of a Viking and asked ‘This picture shows a Viking. Do you agree or disagree?’ Those who agreed gave reasons such as ‘His badge has a Viking sign on it'/'He is wearing a cape’ and ‘He has a scruffy beard’. Those who disagreed said, ‘He is not wearing a helmet. All Vikings wear helmets!'/ ‘He doesn’t have a sporran.'/ ‘He has the wrong sword’. At the beginning of a lesson on Vikings, students’ prior knowledge and misconceptions were quickly revealed.

The statement can also become ‘Is it always, sometimes or never true?’ such as in

• Multiples of 3 are odd numbers
• Odd numbers multiplied by even numbers have odd answers
• The heavier the car, the faster it will travel down the ramp.

Opposites, or one that works and one that doesn’t

Being presented with right and wrong answers appears to give children more prompts, odeling and opportunity for thinking and discussion than simply being asked to work something out from scratch. Some examples:

The opposing standpoint

This is a very effective strategy for discussing PSHE issues. Notice that the original questions are actually good questions, but follow expected and conventional thinking. The reframed questions force children to think of issues from an unconventional standpoint. Some examples:

Instead of asking ‘How did Cinderella feel about her stepmother?’ one teacher asked ‘How could Cinderella have helped her stepmother become a better person? ' One usually low achieving student commented:

‘Odd one out’ and ‘What went wrong?’

Both of these strategies link particularly well with mathematics. I watched a teacher start a lesson on equivalent fractions, asking which was the odd one out between 1/3, 25/50, 1/2 or 50/100. Their responses on whiteboards showed that 2 children didn’t understand, who were immediately asked to chat to their talk partner to see why they got two different answers.

For a lesson on properties of 2D shapes, ‘Which of these shapes is the odd one out? How many different answers can you find?’ produced a wealth of ideas and clear indication of which properties students already knew.

Using old pupil work to start a lesson with the question ‘Where did they go wrong?’ demands that students analyze and deconstruct, thus demonstrating their knowledge but also helping them reconstruct it. After learning about multiplication grids, one teacher asked the class what had gone wrong here:

The mistake is not obvious, which means some thinking has to take place....

The teacher from my second DVD presents his students with success criteria and an incorrect .

So what did elementary students think about these questions?

For more information regarding Shirley’s latest book ‘Outstanding Formative Assessment’ and DVDs of teachers in action, .

For more information about Shirley Clarke, .