The policymakers who control the future of the No Child Left Behind Act agree the law needs changing. But they don鈥檛 agree on how extensive those changes need to be or how to enact them.
As the law turned 6 years old this week, a leading Democrat signaled that he would push for a bill that would make far-reaching revisions to the NCLB law鈥檚 accountability rules and add new programs to help schools reach the law鈥檚 goal that all students be proficient in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-14 school year.
鈥淭he law still needs major changes to bring out the best in all children,鈥� Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, of The Washington Post on Jan. 7. Such revisions, he added, would include rewarding schools for 鈥渋ncremental progress鈥� and changing the accountability rules so they don鈥檛 encourage teachers to focus on test preparation.
But President Bush and Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings suggested that they favor less significant changes to the law鈥攁nd they are willing to use administrative powers to achieve their ends.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 want the No Child Left Behind Act to be viewed as something that hamstrings innovation. There ought to be flexibility in the system,鈥� to Horace Greeley Elementary School in Chicago. 鈥淲e鈥檙e going to provide help for struggling schools鈥攅xtra help. We want to make sure that a high school degree means something.鈥�
Secretary Spellings, in a Jan. 10 speech at the National Press Club in Washington, said: 鈥淐ongress has had over a year to consider these reforms, but students and teachers need help now. So if Congress doesn鈥檛 produce a strong bill quickly, I will move forward.鈥�
Happy Anniversary?
The posturing over the NCLB law鈥檚 future came in a variety of events and statements designed to mark the anniversary of President Bush鈥檚 signing of the law. At the signing ceremony on Jan. 8, 2002, Mr. Bush celebrated Republican leaders on education, as well as Sen. Kennedy and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., who is now the chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee.
Although Sen. Kennedy and Rep. Miller remain supporters of the law, they are calling for more extensive changes than the Bush administration would like. What鈥檚 more, Rep. Miller is criticizing the administration for not supporting his committee鈥檚 efforts to reauthorize the law, which stalled last fall as a much-debated draft bill didn鈥檛 receive enough support from either Democrats or Republicans.
鈥淚t is baffling that the Bush administration鈥檚 sudden sense of urgency to change the law is coming on the heels of our committee鈥檚 efforts to significantly improve No Child Left Behind,鈥� Rep. Miller said in a statement released after Secretary Spellings鈥� Jan. 10 speech. 鈥淥ver the last year, we have offered the president many opportunities to work with us in good faith. Instead, he has refused to take part in any meaningful negotiations.鈥�
The division between congressional Democrats and the administration raises questions over whether they will reach agreement on legislative revisions to the NCLB law before President Bush leaves office next January.
Accountability Differences
For example, Democrats and the administration appear far apart on the law鈥檚 accountability measures. In his Washington Post op-ed this week, Sen. Kennedy wrote that the law should allow school districts to use 鈥渁 broader array of information, beyond test scores, to determine which schools need small adjustments and which need extensive reforms.鈥�
But President Bush and Secretary Spellings reinforced their support for the key elements of the current accountability system, which requires states to assess students in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 and once in high school. Using those data as the primary measure, states determine whether schools are making adequate yearly progress鈥攐r AYP鈥攖oward the goal of universal proficiency.
In Chicago, President Bush said he would veto any bill that 鈥渨eakens the accountability system in the No Child Left Behind Act.鈥� He issued a similar pledge in October. (鈥淏ush Says He Would Veto NCLB Reauthorization Bill That Lacked Key Elements,鈥� Oct. 24, 2007.)
Answering a question at the National Press Club event, Ms. Spellings said the administration would reject proposals to let schools assess less frequently than every year or to postpone the target date for universal proficiency. It also would oppose, she said, adding 鈥渟o many measures 鈥� that people are confused鈥� about the meaning of the accountability system鈥檚 results.
The House鈥檚 draft would have allowed states to use other measures鈥攕uch as test scores on other subjects and attendance鈥攖o supplement reading and math scores.
While there is widespread agreement that the law needs revisions, the NCLB law will stay in effect without congressional action to amend or reauthorize it, Secretary Spellings told reporters on Air Force One while en route to Chicago with the president, according to a White House transcript.
The law includes a clause that allows Congress to continue to fund its programs in future years, even if it does not formally reauthorize them, she added. Ms. Spellings, though, may preempt Congress and offer administrative changes that could alter the way schools and districts implement the law.
She did not specify in her Press Club speech what actions she might take, but she did highlight her regulatory actions to date.
Administrative Changes
The biggest is a pilot project allowing nine states to calculate the AYP status of schools and districts based on students鈥� academic growth. Under the law, accountability decisions are made by comparing every grade level鈥檚 test score with the scores of the previous year鈥檚 class.
Last month, Ms. Spellings invited all states to propose growth models, lifting a cap of 10 participating states when she created the pilot project in 2005.
To gather suggestions for her next action, Secretary Spellings said she would be traveling extensively in coming months. In addition to going to Chicago with the president, she testified on the NCLB law in the Florida legislature this week. During the week of Jan. 14, she plans to visit California, Oregon, and Washington.
In addition to their policy differences, the Bush administration and Democrats disagree over funding of the NCLB law.
On Air Force One, Secretary Spellings defended the funding for the law鈥檚 programs, saying that appropriations have increased by more than 40 percent since 2001.
On Jan. 7, a federal appeals court reinstated a lawsuit claiming that states and districts shouldn鈥檛 be required to spend their own funds to pay for costs associated with implementing the NCLB law鈥檚 rules.
Sen. Kennedy wrote that the law 鈥渇ails to supply the essential resources that schools desperately need to improve their performance.鈥� In a Jan. 7 statement, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said that the law has been 鈥渧astly underfunded.鈥�
Rep. Miller, in his Jan. 10 statement, said: 鈥淲e simply won鈥檛 be able to improve our public schools as long as President Bush continues to deprive states and schools of the resources they need to succeed.鈥�
